Open Access

Aging and health among migrants in a European perspective

Public Health Reviews201637:20

DOI: 10.1186/s40985-016-0036-1

Received: 2 July 2016

Accepted: 5 October 2016

Published: 26 October 2016

Abstract

Population aging and the associated changes in demographic structures and healthcare needs is a key challenge across Europe. Healthy aging strategies focus on ensuring the ability to maintain health, quality of life and independent living at old age. Concurrent to the process of population aging, the demographics of Europe are affected by increased migration resulting in substantial ethnic diversity. In this paper, we narratively review the health profile of the growing proportion of aging migrants in Europe, outline key factors shaping health among this diverse group and consider ways of addressing their healthcare needs.

Although factors shaping aging processes are largely similar across populations, migrant-specific risk factors exist. These include exposure to health risks before and during migration; a more disadvantaged socioeconomic position; language barriers and low health literacy; cultural factors influencing health-seeking behaviours; and psychosocial vulnerability and discrimination affecting health and quality of life. Overall, migrants experience the same morbidity and mortality causes as the native populations, but with different relative importance, severity and age of onset and with substantial differences within and between migrant groups. Little is known regarding health behaviours among aging migrants, although differences in cancer screening behaviours have been identified. Indications of widening health differentials between migrants and native populations with age and informal barriers to quality healthcare for aging migrants are causes of concern.

In conclusion, there is a need for attention to migration alongside other determinants of healthy aging. The diversity in individual characteristics, life course processes and contextual factors shaping aging processes among migrants point to the need for a sensitive and comprehensive approach to policies, practices and research within the field of healthy aging. This is important to accommodate for the needs of the growing number of aging migrants in Europe and counter inequities in health and well-being at old age.

Keywords

Aging Health Migration Healthcare delivery Europe

Background

Migration within the context of population aging in Europe

Population aging caused by consistently low birth rates and increased life expectancy is stated by the European Commission as one of the greatest economic and social challenges for European societies in the 21st century [1]. With more than 20 % of Europeans expected to be 65 years or over in 2025, and a particularly sharp increase in the proportion of people above the age of 80 years, the demographic structures of European countries are undergoing fundamental changes with implication for all sectors of society, not least the health and social care sectors [2]. The importance of addressing population aging in Europe is underscored by changes in age dependency ratios, with a declining share of the population of working age and rising proportions in need of long-term and often complex health and social care in all European countries [2]. Correspondingly, active and healthy aging has been proposed as a keystone for a sustainable Europe in this context of rapid demographic changes [1, 3]. Through a range of intersectoral strategies focusing on individual and structural factors affecting the ability to maintain health and uphold active and independent living into old age, policies outlined both at the global, regional and country levels seek to ensure sustainable societies in the context of population aging [1, 4, 5].

Healthy populations are an important prerequisite for societal progress and prosperity; however, whereas active and healthy aging has been addressed within the context of overall societal sustainability, less focus has been given to diversity in aging processes and experiences both globally and within European populations [5, 6]. The ability to uphold an active and fulfilling life at old age is shaped by a complex range of individual and contextual factors at play across the lifespan of the individual. Variations in indicators of healthy aging such as functional decline, disease burden and quality of life among aging populations are determined by not only well-recognized factors such as gender, sex and socioeconomic position but also by migration and the age at which migration takes place [58]. Concurrent to the process of population aging, Europe has experienced increased immigration and a corresponding rise in ethnic diversity, a process that has been more pronounced in the north-western and some southern countries than in the eastern European countries [9, 10]. For historical, political and geographical reasons, migrant populations differ between European countries [9]. Whereas, e.g. the UK, France and the Netherlands have longer histories of receiving migrants and thus have larger proportions of aging people with different ethnic backgrounds, some north-western European countries, such as Denmark, Sweden and Germany, are only now seeing the aging of the so-called first generation of labour migrants, primarily from Turkey, Pakistan (particularly in Denmark and Sweden) as well as Southern Europe and the Balkans (particularly in Germany). In some countries in southern Europe, such as Spain, Italy and Greece, work migration is limited and recent, as these countries have traditionally been emigration countries. The influx of predominantly younger refugees, in particular to Greece and Italy, and subsequently to northern Europe, has been substantial in recent years [9].

The diversity in characteristics of aging migrants in Europe should be clearly recognized in order to grasp the complexity of migration and aging [5]. For instance, in addition to the groups listed above, aging migrants in Germany include resettlers who are ethnic Germans who return-migrated from the former Soviet Union and often know the German language. The so-called sunset migrants comprise of aging north-western Europeans settling in Southern Europe after retirement, often with little integration into the local society [11]. Aging migrants across Europe therefore represent diverse characteristics ranging from the very affluent and privileged groups of ‘sunset migrants’ expressing positive perspectives on active aging to more deprived groups of, e.g. aging refugees with partly or largely unmet needs in terms of health and welfare [12]. Disregarding the great diversity among aging migrants in Europe may result in the construction of an undue homogenous social category of ‘aging migrants’, thus contributing to other discourses on migrants [13].

The ability to reach the goal of healthy aging is shaped by both previous and current individual, social and contextual factors as well as country-level policies and services in the fields of migration, social welfare and health [6, 13, 14]. Overall, migrants, encompassing both labour migrants, asylum seekers and refugees, are younger than indigenous populations in Europe, and although few data have so far been released with respect to the proportion of aging migrants in Europe, an increase can be expected as these groups age and with little indication of remigration [10, 15]. With substantial, persistent differences in health outcomes and their underlying social determinants across different socioeconomic and migrant/ethnic groups [1619], there is now a need for more focus on how these intersecting characteristics shape healthy aging and ways of addressing this within healthcare services. Insight into the health of aging migrants in Europe is integral to such efforts. To contribute towards this goal, we narratively review the health profile of aging migrants in Europe, outline some of the factors shaping their health and consider ways of addressing their healthcare needs.

Identifying key literature on aging and migration

Studies for this narrative review were included based on a literature search in the following databases: PsycINFO, MEDLINE and Google Scholar in May 2016 using variations and combinations of the search terms: migrants, migration, aging, aged, health behaviour, morbidity, mortality, health status, mental health, quality of life, health promotion, disease prevention, health services, quality of care, palliative care and remigration. There were no restrictions in terms of year of publication. Only published, peer-reviewed literature in English or German was included in this review. We retrieved a total of 663 publications after de-duplication. The first author screened publications first by title and then by abstract according to the following inclusion criteria:
  • Population characteristics: we were interested in studies in migrant populations above the age of 50 years living in Europe

  • Outcome: health behaviour, morbidity, mortality, quality of life, healthcare access and utilization

References within relevant articles were screened for additional studies. Full-text versions of relevant abstracts (n = 33) and book chapters were obtained for inclusion and summarized and synthesized qualitatively. Key European policies pertaining to healthy aging in general and background literature on the intersection between migration and health were included to contextualize findings from the narrative review of individual studies.

Similarities and differences in aging processes across migrants and native populations

Aging encompasses a long time span in the lives of people with associated changes in healthcare needs. In the years prior to retirement, maintaining the ability to work is often a central issue. It is in itself a protective factor against functional decline, morbidity and mortality. In this time span, health behaviour issues relate to maintenance of health and prevention of disease, e.g. participation in screening programmes and preventive health visits. As age increases, issues related to the management of chronic diseases and often multimorbidity, which goes hand in hand with multiple medications, become of higher importance. They comprise timely diagnosis, adherence to treatment and continuity of care, which all necessitate increased interactions with healthcare services and reliance on social support networks that can help to cope with disease. With old age, issues also related to cognitive decline, bereavement and palliative care increase in importance.

Aging processes vary within and across different population groups. They go along with heterogeneity in health status and healthcare needs, which depend on gender, sex, age, socioeconomic background, sociocultural resources, contextual factors at, e.g. community levels, and more distant, structural policies and practices fostering or hindering healthy lives across the lifespan [5, 6, 17, 20]. In the following, we will focus on particular health and healthcare issues faced by aging migrants. To a large extent, they overlap with those faced by socioeconomically disadvantaged aging people in the native populations of the countries they have settled in. Some risks to health occur with age irrespective of migrant background, such as economic disadvantage and decline related to low income after retirement and increased out-of-pocket payments for treatment/medicines; social isolation caused by functional decline, loss of spouse/friends or lack of social roles related to labour market participation; and increased care responsibilities for the spouse [5]. However, other factors shaping aging processes are specific for migrants. This includes exposures in the country of origin, during migration and after settlement [7, 8, 20, 21]. Such factors shape both health behaviours, somatic and mental health and ultimately mortality throughout the life course and thus also at old age [16, 20, 22]. For example, some migrant groups may have been exposed to high rates of infectious diseases, malnutrition and traumatic experiences in the country of origin and/or during migration that influences their life-long risk of illness, further complicated by lack of appropriate preventive care and medical treatment during migration [16, 23]. In addition, migrants are more likely to be exposed to discontinuity of treatment and side effects because of suboptimal adherence due to pendular migration (repeated travels to their country of birth) or during long stays in precarious legal situations (e.g. for asylum seekers and irregular migrants with limited access to healthcare).

Furthermore, migrants from non-Western countries are more likely to be disadvantaged in terms of socioeconomic position due to lower levels of educational achievement, un/underemployment and obligations towards relatives abroad (e.g. through sending of remittances) than native populations [24, 25]. Socioeconomic background is closely related to health behaviours and health status and often has substantial explanatory power in studies of health inequalities between migrants and native populations [19, 26].

In addition, low HDL cholesterol and associated risk of heart disease and intra-abdominal obesity increasing the risk of diabetes exist in some migrant groups. These genetic differences may partly explain higher occurrence of these diseases; however, morbidity differentials are not predetermined but can be reduced by good access to care and uptake of prevention.

Besides migration processes, ethnicity is an additional important factor to take into consideration when describing and explaining health behaviours and health status among aging migrants in Europe [26, 27]. Health behaviours and health status vary substantially across different ethnic groups, often due to a complex interplay between cultural factors, such as dietary practices or physical activity patterns, contextual factors such as socioeconomic background and residential area characteristics (for example, deprivation, inadequate access to services) and individual factors such as language competencies [26, 27].

Language barriers and low health literacy are more common among aging migrants partly due to limited educational experiences and partly to the age-dependent reduction in second language abilities due to cognitive decline. They constitute additional risk factors for poor health and barriers to healthcare that are relatively more common among migrants compared to native European populations. Poor levels of health literacy may lead to less optimal health behaviours, poorer health status and limited access to high quality healthcare [28, 29]. For example, inability to read and act upon written information on how to lower risks for diabetes or how to access a range of medical services may negatively affect the health of aging migrants. Language barriers may as well be even more present among aging refugees suffering from posttraumatic stress syndrome (PTSD) [5, 30].

Psychosocial vulnerability such as experiences with discrimination and segregation in society, stigma pertaining to some diseases and culture-specific perceptions of health and expectations to healthcare constitute additional health-related risk factors and barriers to appropriate, timely and coordinated healthcare for aging migrants [31, 32]. Although most of these factors may place aging migrants in a disadvantaged position in terms of health and healthcare utilization, it is important to also recognize the many sociocultural resources that migrants possess, including the resilience and coping strategies implicit in experiencing migration processes and settling in new contexts and other sociocultural resources such as social support structures in ethnic/religious communities and faith-based or spiritual resources in coping with disease and death [33].

Specific issues of health and disease among aging migrants

The ability to identify key health needs and efficient strategies for meeting these among aging migrants in Europe is severely restricted by the limited evidence base with few studies reported so far. In appraising the health profiles of aging migrants in Europe, it is furthermore important to acknowledge both the differences within and between groups and importantly that changes do occur with time and across generations as exemplified by studies of changing dietary patterns and sedentary lifestyles among migrant groups settling in Europe [20, 26, 34]. In the following, we briefly outline some specific issues related to health and disease among aging migrants in regard to health and health-seeking behaviours, particular patterns of morbidity and mortality as well as access and quality regarding healthcare.

Health behaviours and early detection of disease

Health behaviours are largely established prior to old age; however, little is known about this process and potential changes with age among migrants. Aging migrants from non-Western countries may be less likely to drink alcohol whereas aging migrant women may be less likely to smoke compared to native populations [35, 36]. Lack of physical activity, low consumption of fruit and vegetables and intake of a diet high in fat is relatively more common among migrant groups compared to the general native population, however with substantial differences within and between different migrant groups [13, 37]. For screening programmes and other interventions aimed at ensuring early detection of disease among aging adults, there is a substantial social gradient in uptake, of, e.g. breast and colon cancer screening. Some migrant populations are less likely to participate, possibly due to language barriers and differences in risk perceptions. Others, such as Turkish women in Germany, show high participation rates [38, 39]. Of particular relevance for health behaviours among aging migrants are the competing demands they may experience in daily life, making it hard to prioritize health behaviour change and early diagnosis. This relates for example to extended families. While these may comprise a valuable source of practical support in everyday life and for those who are aging and ill, social roles and obligations may as well be a strain on the individual person, in particular in the context of aging [25, 40, 41]. Responsibilities for the well-being of extended families and preferences for upholding care within families may negatively affect the ability to maintain health, for example, through regular physical activity, and to seek healthcare if symptoms arise [25, 40]. Financial obligations, for example, through sending remittances to family members in the country of origin, may be an additional responsibility for aging migrants, thus reducing their financial capability for health-related expenses [25]. Psychosocial vulnerability caused by, e.g. exposure to trauma, social isolation in relation to the wider society or competing priorities within extended family networks, may reduce engagement in health promotion activities and negatively affect the ability to cope with disease, thus shaping health status and healthcare utilization [42]. Even if migrants are part of extended family networks, the availability of supportive networks should not be assumed. Through the process of resettling into Europe, family networks may have been dispersed, sometimes across several countries. Recent migrants, those from smaller ethnic groups and those experiencing functional decline at old age, may find themselves in a situation with few contacts to the wider community [40]. In addition, those with potentially stigmatizing or life-limiting illnesses, such as dementia, cancers or mental illness, may be socially isolated and correspondingly in need of formal social support for example from health and social care professionals and patient associations [41, 43]. Furthermore, research has identified ethnic differences in norms related to family responsibility as some aging migrants prefer to be cared for by their family members rather than professional caregivers [44].

Particular patterns of morbidity and mortality

Broadly speaking, migrants experience the same morbidity and mortality patterns as the native populations, but with different relative importance, severity and age of onset. Younger migrants may experience a transitory ‘healthy migrant effect’. However, the lower risk of, for example, developing cancers among many migrant groups in Europe is lost with time not only due to changes in health behaviours, such as smoking and sedentary lifestyles, but also due to exposures to different contextual risk factors [20, 45]. It is uncertain whether unfavourable exposures in the country of origin and the immigration country may lead to earlier onset and potentially more severe chronic disease with age among migrants compared to native populations [22, 46]. A recent British study found older people from ethnic minorities to report poorer health outcomes even after controlling for social and economic disadvantages and that health differentials between ethnic minority and the majority population increase with age for both men and women [47]. This supports concerns that whereas native populations may benefit from an increasing compression of morbidity at old age, migrant populations may not benefit in the same way. This would contribute to growing differentials in health between population groups [48]. In terms of disease-specific morbidity, most cancers are less frequent among migrants. Stomach cancer and liver cancer, however, are more common due to low hygiene and infection with Helicobacter pylori and hepatitis B/C [49, 50]. For cardiovascular disease, the picture is more heterogeneous and also dependent on the risk in the country of origin. Some populations, in particular of South Asian origin, are at higher risk of both diabetes and cardiovascular disease [27, 49, 51]. As is the case in the general population, and in particularly among aging people, multimorbidity is common among migrant groups in Europe [27, 52]. Some migrant groups have comparably higher rates of gastrointestinal diseases (including esophagitis, gallstone disease, pancreatitis and Crohn’s disease) and higher risks of respiratory disease compared to native populations [53].

Self-rated health is strongly related to future morbidity and mortality and aging migrant and ethnic minority groups have been found to be comparatively more likely to rate their health as poor [47].

The prevalence of poor mental health tends to be higher among migrant groups overall, and specifically depression has been found to be more common among aging migrants across a range of European countries [5456]. For dementia, no clear pattern emerges, but higher prevalences in some ethnic groups may be related to vascular diseases [56]. Psychological distress is related to a range of individual and contextual factors including stressful situations and events such as experiences of assault, overcrowding, low standards of living and absence of family and confidants that may be more common among migrants of lower socioeconomic background and which may carry particular importance at old age [26, 57]. Suicide tends to be a less common cause of death although suicide rates among aging migrants are increasing [18, 49, 58].

Access to and quality of healthcare

Access to quality healthcare concerns dimensions related to entitlement, that is, whether these groups have formal rights to services, for example, through comprehensive health insurance schemes, but it also relates to the ability of the individual person to seek appropriate healthcare when in need. Inequities in health and healthcare refer to the presence of systematic and potentially avoidable differences in health status or access to and outcomes of healthcare among population groups defined according to, for example, socioeconomic background, geographical area or ethnicity [59]. Research on access to healthcare among aging migrants in particular is scarce, but health services research focusing on migrants in general has demonstrated that language barriers, low health literacy, lack of social networks facilitating access to timely care and insecurities related to intercultural encounters on part of both patients and providers do constitute barriers that may affect access to care for aging migrants [60, 61]. Inequity in hospital healthcare provision is unlikely to be a major concern in Europe overall [62, 63]. However, access to and quality of rehabilitation programmes was found to be lower among migrants than among the majority population in Germany [64].

Responding to the increasing number of aging migrants in Europe

Despite the limited evidence base, some overall recommendations for responding to increased ethnic diversity at the policy, practice and research levels can be outlined.

Migration as a determinant of healthy aging in policy approaches

To ensure equity, societal and healthcare strategies need to be responsive to the aspirations and needs of ethnic diverse populations in an aging Europe. Migration should preferably be acknowledged and incorporated into healthy aging policies such as the European strategy for active and healthy aging as an important determinant of health alongside other key determinants such as gender, age and socioeconomic background. Focus areas for active and healthy aging as outlined by the European Commission include
  1. 1.

    Devising integrated care plans for chronic diseases

     
  2. 2.

    Ensuring adherence to treatment

     
  3. 3.

    Delivering personalized health management and falls prevention approaches

     
  4. 4.

    Preventing frailty and functional decline and ensuring early diagnosis of these condition

     
  5. 5.

    Scaling-up innovative and evidence-based cases for chronic disease management among aging people

     
  6. 6.

    Developing independent living solutions, and fostering innovation for age-friendly buildings, cities and environments [1, 3]

     

Attention to specific needs among aging migrants should be integral in all these strategies to ensure adequate focus and resource allocation.

The needs of aging migrants must become part of organizations’ mainstream activities. Although migration is just one of many factors shaping care and treatment encounters for older people, the process of migration, cultural values and language barriers may give rise to specific needs for aging migrants. There is a need for awareness raising at all institutional levels including cultural sensitivity training of healthcare staff and prioritizing new strategies for overcoming informal barriers in service delivery caused by cultural, socioeconomic and language differences between professionals and aging users [27, 65, 66]. Policy commitment must be combined with relevant and feasible recommendations at the practice level, e.g. pertaining to the need for overcoming language barriers and adapting to cultural differences in healthcare for aging populations. Finally, it is important to ensure accountability and documentation of progress through the use of performance indicators.

Adapting healthy aging interventions to include aging migrants

Insight into health among diverse migrant groups in Europe has increased substantially in recent decades. However, more focus on particular needs of aging migrants is warranted as we are still lacking robust insight into how to successfully address inequalities in health and living circumstances across aging populations. As health and disease are shaped by a range of exposures and behaviours across the life course of the individual person, there is a need for early interventions depending on the evidence regarding causal processes and the windows of opportunities focusing on promoting and supporting healthy behaviours and cultural resources in migrant groups and preventing risk behaviours that lead to higher disease burden and functional decline among aging people [20, 67]. Although few robust intervention studies have been carried out among aging migrants in Europe to date, general lessons can be teased out based on the knowledge related to principles for public health interventions for ethnic diverse populations [23, 6870]. In particular, there is a need for combining individual-oriented health interventions focusing on increasing awareness and skills with more comprehensive community-based, structural interventions aiming to ensure that social networks processes, private and public service providers and the built environment of communities facilitate healthy aging that are relevant for ethnic diverse groups of aging people [17, 23, 67]. An inter-sectorial approach is needed when combining interventions at the structural and the individual level, thus necessitating involvement of a range of sectors including primary healthcare, urban planning and non-governmental and private partners such as faith-based associations, religious leaders or private companies in a particular community [6, 17]. Although this is relevant for healthy aging interventions in general, adapting interventions to diverse cultural and language needs is important for successfully addressing the multitude of individual and contextual factors framing the everyday life and aging processes of migrants in an inclusive way [71]. This could be achieved through making interpreters readily available in interventions for diverse groups, and through engaging migrant communities, thereby ensuring relevance of approaches and capacity-building among the target group [7173]. Intercultural training of front-line staff in contact with aging people, recruitment of ethnic minority staff and volunteers and behaviour change interventions through peer education are examples of such participatory approaches [65, 72]. As aging migrants may be particularly at risk of social isolation, not only strengthening of social support structures within ethnic communities but also establishing relationships to aging people from native populations is important. In addition, mapping relevant public and private stakeholders and gatekeepers in ethnic diverse communities would enable a broader scope in recruitment strategies into healthy aging interventions. Finally, dissemination of good practices across contexts is needed in particular as some European countries have a longer history of adapting healthcare services to culturally and linguistically diverse populations.

A note of caution is warranted as there are differences in needs and resources within and between migrant groups as discussed above. The interactions of many factors in relation to health makes it important to carefully consider whether services for aging migrants should be focused specifically on migrants (migrant-specific services) or just migrant-sensitive (inclusionist) as part of the general healthcare system [74]. The principle of implementing equal strategies in situations of equal needs (horizontal equity) should be balanced with strategies that differ between subpopulations to achieve equal chances of optimum outcomes (vertical equity) in healthy aging. An example of the latter approach is the recently established migrant health clinics at selected Danish hospitals that are specifically targeting the complex healthcare needs among migrant groups and the move towards culturally sensitive care initiatives across a range of European countries [42].

Ensuring timely diagnosis and access to high-quality, well-coordinated patient-centred care is even more central to aging individuals than to the general population, not least within the increasingly complex and accelerated treatment regimens requiring patients to engage in self-care in the context of their everyday life [23, 59, 60]. Besides provision of patient-centred, holistic care within healthcare facilities, culture-sensitive rehabilitation services and psychosocial support for aging patients and their family caregivers must be ensured. This is particularly important in the context of functional and cognitive decline among aging people as the burden on family caregivers, who at times are themselves ill, can be substantial. Migrants may even have different perceptions about caregiving and limited awareness of available sources of practical, emotional and financial support for aging patients [75, 76]. Although the field of palliative or end-of-life care is of importance within aging populations, few studies have explored this topic among migrants. Barriers to the provision of palliative care for migrants have been identified at both the patient and provider levels, pointing to the need for improved awareness and support in case management within healthcare institutions when preparing for increased ethnic diversity in palliative and end-of-life care [41, 77].

Including migrants in healthy aging research

Our narrative review identified a limited evidence base, with most studies originating from Northern and Western parts of Europe. Migrants need to be more systematically included in empirical research within the field of healthy aging in countries across Europe, thus representing the diversity in policies, service-delivery regimes and contexts framing old age. Aging migrants, especially those with multiple deprivation, are often under-represented in national surveys, and registry studies may be complicated by lacking information on migration status and possibly return bias (the so-called Salmon bias) [12, 78, 79]. There is therefore a need for improved recruitment of ethnic diverse populations with oversampling to ensure representativeness of results and for data collection to be disaggregated also by migration background and socioeconomic status in national registries based on routine data [80]. Comparisons between migrant groups from the same country of origin moving to different host countries, and preferably comparing to disease burdens in their countries of origin, would be helpful in providing insights into the effect of factors specific to immigration countries; however, this requires uniform definition of migrants across Europe as well as attention to differences in disease rates between immigration countries. Longitudinal studies with due consideration of individual, social and contextual factors shaping health at old age are needed. Finally, to facilitate healthy aging interventions that are acceptable and efficient for aging migrants, more intervention studies are needed focusing on both individual- and community-level interventions across the spectrum from health promotion/disease prevention, early detection, adherence to treatment, psychosocial needs among aging people and their relatives and finally end-of-life care for diverse migrant groups. Community-based interventions with inclusion of staff with ethnic diverse backgrounds are recommended. This approach is currently being explored in a Dutch study on the effectiveness of involving ethnic community health workers in the provision of culturally sensitive care for aging migrants [70].

Conclusions

We have in this paper focused on the health needs and underlying determinants among the growing population of aging migrants in Europe. There is a need for attention to migration and ethnicity alongside other factors such as gender and socioeconomic position that intersect in determining the ability to live a healthy and fulfilling life at old age. The diversity in individual characteristics, life course processes and contextual factors shaping aging processes among migrants necessitates a sensitive and comprehensive approach to policies, practices and research within the field of healthy aging to accommodate for the needs of the growing number of aging migrants in Europe and counter inequities in health and well-being at old age.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Maria Kristiansen is supported by a grant from the Nordea Foundation under the Center for Healthy Aging. The research team is independent of the funder.

Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed to the design of this review. MK retrieved and synthesized the literature and drafted the manuscript which was then revised in collaboration with all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All materials used for this review are available from the first author upon request.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Center for Healthy Aging (CEHA), Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen
(2)
Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University
(3)
Danish Research Center for Migration, Ethnicity and Health (MESU), Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen

References

  1. European Commision. European scaling-up strategy in active and healthy ageing: part of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing, 2015. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/active-healthy-ageing/scaling_up_strategy.pdf#view=fit&pagemode=none. Accessed 30 June 2016.
  2. Eurostat. Population structure and ageing, 2016. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Population_structure_and_ageing. Accessed 30 June 2016.
  3. European Commision. Healthy ageing: keystone for a sustainable Europe. EU health policy in the context of demographic change, 2007. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_information/indicators/docs/healthy_ageing_en.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2016.
  4. World Health Organization. Health and the Millenium Development Goals, 2005. Available at http://www.who.int/hdp/publications/mdg_en.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2016.
  5. World Health Organization. World Report on Ageing and Health, 2015. Available at http://www.who.int/ageing/events/world-report-2015-launch/en/. Accessed 30 June 2016.
  6. Sadana R, Blas E, Budhwani S, Koller T, Paraje G. Healthy ageing: raising awareness of inequalities, determinants, and what could be done to improve health equity. Gerontologist. 2016;56, suppl. 2:S178-S193.
  7. Kristiansen M, Mygind A, Krasnik A. Health effects of migration. Dan Med Bull. 2007;54(1):46–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gubernskaya Z. Age at migration and self-rated health trajectories after age 50: understanding the older immigrant health paradox. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2015;70(2):279–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Salt J. Trends in Europe’s international migration. In: Rechel B, Mladovsky P, Devillé W, Rijks B, Petrova-Benedict R, McKee M, editors. Migration and health in the European Union. Berkshire: Open University Press; 2011. p. 17–36.Google Scholar
  10. Eurostat. Migration and migrant population statistics, 2016. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Migration_and_migrant_population_statistics. Accessed 30 June 2016.
  11. Hall K, Hardill I. Retirement migration, the ‘other’ story: caring for frail elderly British citizens in Spain. Ageing Soc. 2016;36(3):562–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Warnes AM, Friedrich K, Kellaher L, Torres S. The diversity and welfare of older migrants in Europe. Aging Soc. 2004;24:307–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Torres S. Elderly immigrants in Sweden: ‘otherness’ under construction. J Ethn Migr Stud. 2006;32(8):1341–58.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Torres S, Karl U. A migration lens on inquiries into ageing, old age and elderly care: carving a space while assessing the state of affairs. In: Karl U, Torres S, editors. Ageing in contexts of migration. Oxon: Routledge; 2016. p. 1–12.Google Scholar
  15. Norredam M, Hansen OH, Petersen JH, Kunst AE, Kristiansen M, Krasnik A, et al. Remigration of migrants with severe disease: myth or reality? A register-based cohort study. Eur J Public Health. 2015;25(1):84–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ingleby D, Krasnik A, Lorant V, Razum O. Health inequalities and risk factors among migrants and ethnic minorities. Antwerp and Apeldoom: Garant Publishers; 2012.Google Scholar
  17. Ottersen PE, Dasgupta J, Blouin C, Buss P, Chongsuvivatwong V, Frenk J, et al. The political origins of health inequity: prospects for change. Lancet. 2014;383(9917):630–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Millard AD, Raab G, Lewsey J, Eaglesham P, Craig P, Ralston K, et al. Mortality differences and inequalities within and between ‘protected characteristics’ groups in a Scottish Cohort, 1991-2009. Int J Equity Health. 2015;14:142.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Marmot M, Allen J, Bell R, Bloomer E, Goldblatt P. WHO European review of social determinants of health and the health divide. Lancet. 2012;380(9846):1011–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Spallek J, Zeeb H, Razum O. What do we have to know from migrants’ past exposures to understand their health status? A life course approach. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2011;8:6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. de Oca VM, García TR, Sáenz R, Guillén J. The linkage of life course, migration, health, and aging: health in adults and elderly Mexican migrants. J Aging Health. 2011;23:1116–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Malmusi D, Borrell C, Benach J. Migration-related health inequalities: showing the complex interactions between gender, social class and place of origin. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71:1610–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. World Health Organization. Stepping up action on refugee and migrant health. Towards a WHO European framework for collaborative action. Outcome document of the high-level meeting on refugee and migrant health, 23-24 November 2015. Available at http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/298196/Stepping-up-action-on-refugee-migrant-health.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2016.
  24. Davies AA, Basten A, Frattini C. Migration: a social determinant of migrants’ health. Eurohealth. 2010;16(1):10–2.Google Scholar
  25. Kessing LL, Norredam M, Kvernrod A, Mygind A, Kristiansen M. Contextualising migrants’ health behaviour—a qualitative study of transnational ties and their implications for participation in mammography screening. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:431.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Karlsen S, Becares L, Roth M. Understanding the influence of ethnicity on health. In: Craig G, Atkin K, Chattoo S, Flynn R, editors. Understanding ‘race’and ethnicity, Theory, history, policy, practice. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2012. p. 115–32.Google Scholar
  27. Bhopal R. Inequalities, inequities, and disparities in health and health care by migration status, race, and ethnicity. Migration, Ethnicity, Race, and Health in Multicultural Societies. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 163–95.Google Scholar
  28. Kickbusch IS. Health literacy: addressing the health and education divide. Health Promot Int. 2001;16(3):289–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Razum O, Weishaar H, Schaeffer D. Health literacy: strengthening agency or changing structures? Int J Public Health. 2016;61(3):277–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Teodorescu DS, Heir T, Hauff E, Wentzel-Larsen T, Lien L. Mental health problems and post-migration stress among multi-traumatized refugees attending outpatient clinics upon resettlement to Norway. Scand J Psychol. 2012;53(4):316–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson JL, Bottorff JL, Browne AJ. Othering and being othered in the context of health care services. Health Commun. 2004;16(2):253–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Zubair M, Norris M. Perspectives on ageing, later life and ethnicity: ageing research in ethnic minority contexts. Ageing Soc. 2015;35:897–916.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Kristiansen M, Younis T, Hassani A, Sheikh A. Experiencing loss: a Muslim widow’s bereavement narrative. J Relig Health. 2016;55(1):226–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith NR, Kelly YJ, Nazroo JY. The effects of acculturation on obesity rates in ethnic minorities in England: evidence from the Health Survey for England. Eur J Public Health. 2012;22(3):508–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Reiss K, Schunck R, Razum O. Effect of length of stay on smoking among Turkish and Eastern European immigrants in Germany—interpretation in the light of the smoking epidemic model and the acculturation theory. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(12):15925–36.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Rao R, Schofield P, Ashworth M. Alcohol use, socioeconomic deprivation and ethnicity in older people. BMJ Open. 2015;5(8):e007525.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Landman J, Cruickshank JK. A review of ethnicity, health and nutrition-related diseases in relation to migration in the United Kingdom. Public Health Nutr. 2001;4(2B):647–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Berens EM, Stahl L, Yilmaz-Aslan Y, Sauzet O, Spallek J, Razum O. Participation in breast cancer screening among women of Turkish origin in Germany—a register-based study. BMC Women’s Health. 2014;14:24.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Kristiansen M, Thorsted BL, Krasnik A, von Euler-Chelpin M. Participation in mammography screening among migrants and non-migrants in Denmark. Acta Oncol. 2012;51:28–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kristiansen M, Kessing LL, Norredam M, Krasnik A. Migrants’ perceptions of aging in Denmark and attitudes towards remigration: findings from a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:225.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Kristiansen M, Irshad T, Worth A, Bhopal R, Lawton J, Sheikh A. The practice of hope: a longitudinal, multi-perspective qualitative study among South Asian Sikhs and Muslims with life-limiting illness in Scotland. Ethn Health. 2014;19(1):1–19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Michaelis C, Kristiansen M, Norredam M. Quality of life and coping strategies among immigrant women living with pain in Denmark: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2015;5(7):e008075.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Tezcan-Güntekin H. Interkulturelle Perspektiven auf Demenz [Intercultural Perspectives on Dementia]. In: Gröning K, Sander B, von Kamen R, editors. Familiensensibles Entlassungsmanagement. Frankfurt am Main: Mabuse-Verlag; 2015. p. 233–49.Google Scholar
  44. de Valk HAG, Schans D. ‘They ought to do this for their parents’: perceptions of filial obligations among immigrant and Dutch older people. Ageing Soc. 2008;28:49–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Norredam M, Agyemang C, Hansen OKH, Petersen JH, Byberg S, Krasnik A, et al. Duration of residence and disease occurrence among refugees and family reunited immigrants: test of the ‘healthy migrant effect’ hypothesis. Trop Med Int Health. 2014;19(8):958–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Razum O, Twardella D. Time travel with Oliver Twist—towards an explanation for a paradoxically low mortality among recent immigrants. Trop Med Int Health. 2002;7(1):4–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Evandrou M, Falkingham J, Feng Z, Vlachantoni A. Ethnic inequalities in limiting health and self-reported health in later life revisited. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016;70(7):653–62.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Fries JF, Bruce B, Chakravarty E. Compression of morbidity 1980-2011: a focused review of paradigms and progress. J Aging Res. 2011;2011:261702.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Ikram UZ, Mackenbach JP, Harding S, Rey G, Bhopal RS, Regidor E, et al. All-cause and cause-specific mortality of different migrant populations in Europe. Eur J Epidemiol. 2015;Epub ahead of print.
  50. O’Leary MC, Sawar M, Hutchinson SJ, Weir A, Schofield J, McLeod A, et al. The prevalence of hepatitis C virus among people of South Asian origin in Glasgow—results from a community based survey and laboratory surveillance. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2013;11(5):301–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Malik MO, Govan L, Petrie JR, Ghouri N, Leese C, Fischbacher C, et al. Ethnicity and risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD): 4.8 year follow-up of patients with type 2 diabetes living in Scotland. Diabetologia. 2015;58(4):716–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, Watt G, Wyke S, Guthrie B. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2012;380(9836):37–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Bhopal RS, Cezard G, Bansal N, Ward HJT, Bhala N. Ethnic variations in five lower gastrointestinal diseases: Scottish health and ethnicity linkage study. BMJ Open. 2014;4(10):e006120.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Inhorn M, Serour G. Islam, medicine and Arab-Muslim refugee health in America after 9/11. Lancet. 2011;378:935–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Aichberger MC, Schouler-Ocak M, Mundt A, Busch MA, Nickels E, Heimann HM, et al. Depression in middle-aged and older first generation migrants in Europe: results from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). Eur Psychiatry. 2010;25(8):468–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Livingston G, Leavey G, Kitchen G, Manela M, Sembhi S, Katona C. Mental health of migrant elders—the Islington study. Br J Psychiatry. 2001;179:361–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Bogic M, Njoku A, Priebe S. Long-term mental health of war-refugees: a systematic literature review. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2015;15:29.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Shah A, Lindesay J, Dennis M. Comparison of elderly suicide rates among migrants in England and Wales with their country of origin. In J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009;24(3):292–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Starfield B. The hidden inequity in health care. Int J Equity Health. 2011;10:15.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR. Unequal treatment. Confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  61. Norredam M, Krasnik A. Migrants’ access to health services. In: Rechel B, Mladovsky P, Devillé W, Rijks B, Petrova-Benedict R, McKee M, editors. Migration and health in the European Union. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2011. p. 67-78.
  62. Bansal N, Fischbacher CM, Bhopal RS, Brown H, Steiner MFC. Myocardial infarction incidence and survival by ethnic group: Scottish Health and Ethnicity Linkage retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2013;3(9):e003415.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Bhopal RS, Steiner MFC, Cezard G, Bansal N, Fischbacher C, Simpson CR, et al. Risk of respiratory hospitalization and death, readmission and subsequent mortality: Scottish health and ethnicity linkage study. Eur J Public Health. 2016;25(5):769–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Brzoska P, Voigtländer S, Spallek J, Razum O. Utilization and effectiveness of medical rehabilitation in foreign nationals residing in Germany. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(651):660.Google Scholar
  65. Fleckman JM, Corso MD, Ramirez S, Begalieva M, Johnson CC. Intercultural competency in public health: a call for action to incorporate training into public health education. Front Public Health. 2015;3:210.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Kleinman A, Benson P. Anthropology in the clinic: the problem of cultural competency and how to fix it. PLoS Med. 2006;3(10):e294.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Anderson NB, Bulatao A, Cohen B. Critical perspectives on racial and ethnic differences in health in late life. Washington: National Academies Press; 2004.Google Scholar
  68. World Health Organization. The Ottowa Charter for Health Promotion, 1986. Available at http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/129532/Ottawa_Charter.pdf?ua=1. Acessed 30 June 2016.
  69. Liu JJ, Davidson E, Bhopal RS, White M, Johnson RD, Netto G, et al. Adapting health promotion interventions to meet the needs of ethnic minority groups: mixed-methods evidence synthesis. Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(44):1–469.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Verhagen I, Ros WJ, Steunenberg B, de Wit NJ. Culturally sensitive care for elderly immigrants through ethnic community health workers: design and development of a community based intervention programme in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:227.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Johnson M. User and community involvement in health and social care research with migrants and ethnic minorities. In: Ingleby D, Krasnik A, Lorant V, Razum O, editors. Health Inequalities and Risk Factors among Migrants and Ethnic Minorities. 1st ed. Antwerp and Apeldoom: Garant Publishers; 2012. p. 173–87.Google Scholar
  72. Davidson E, Liu JJ, Bhopal RS, White M, Johnson RD, Netto G, et al. Behavior change interventions to improve the health of racial and ethnic minority populations: a tool kit of adaptation approaches. Milbank Q. 2013;91(4):811–51.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Nierkens V, Hartman MA, Nicolaou M, Vissenberg C, Beune EJAJ, Hosper K, et al. Effectiveness of cultural adaptations of interventions aimed at smoking cessation, diet, and/or physical activity in ethnic minorities: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e73373.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Razum O, Spallek J. Addressing health-related interventions to immigrants: migrant-specific or diversity-sensitive? Int J Public Health. 2014;59(6):893–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Kristiansen M, Tjørnhøj-Thomsen T, Krasnik A. The benefit of meeting a stranger: experiences with emotional support provided by nurses among Danish-born and migrant cancer patients. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2010;14:244–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Montoro-Rodriguez J, Gallagher-Thompson D. The role of resources and appraisals in predicting burden among Latina and non-Hispanic white female caregivers: a test of an expanded socio-cultural model of stress and coping. Aging Ment Health. 2009;13(5):648–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Worth A, Irshad T, Bhopal R, Brown D, Lawton J, Grant E, et al. Vulnerability and access to care for South Asian Sikh and Muslim patients with life limiting illness in Scotland: prospective longitudinal qualitative study. BMJ. 2009;338:b183.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  78. Bhopal R. Challenges of collecting and interpreting data using the concepts of ethnicity and race. In: Ethnicity, Race, and Health in Multicultural Societies, Foundations for better epidemiology, public health and health care. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 60–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Razum O, Zeeb H, Rohrmann S. The “healthy migrant effect”—not merely a fallacy of inaccurate denominator figures (letter). Int J Epidemiol. 2000;29(1):191–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Mir G, Salway S, Kai J, Karlsen S, Bhopal R, Ellison GTH, et al. Principles for research on ethnicity and health: the Leeds Consensus Statement. Eur J Public Health. 2013;23(3):504–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016