Skip to main content

Table 1 Study characteristics

From: Assessing the value of screening tools: reviewing the challenges and opportunities of cost-effectiveness analysis

Authors

Country

Disease

Screening tools (strategies)

Comparator

Population

Time horizon

Perspective

Discounting

Monetary units

Effectiveness outcome

ICER

Conclusion of base case

Funding

Treatment

Albright et al. [55]

USA

Group B Streptococci

Universal screening with rectovaginal swab

No screening

Women with a prior cesarean delivery and a current singleton pregnancy planning to undergo a repeat cesarean

Lifetime

Healthcare

3%

2015 USD

Neonatal QALYs

Yes

Not CE

NA

Yes

Aronsson et al. [12]

Sweden

Colorectal cancer (CRC)

1. Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) twice

2. Colonoscopy (once)

3. FIT every 2 years

4. Colonoscopy every 10 years

No Screening

60-year-old Swedish

Lifetime

Healthcare

3%

EUR (no year)

QALYs

No

All strategies were CE vs no screening

SCREESCO study

Yes

Atkin et al. [18]

UK

Colorectal cancer

13 different Sttrategies

Each other and “no colonoscopy”

Individuals with intermediate-grade adenomatous polyps

Lifetime

NHS

4%

2012–2013 GBP

QALYs, ELYs

Yes

3-yearly ongoing colonoscopic surveillance without an age cut-off is CE

NIHR

Yes

Baggaley et al. [75]

UK

HIV

INSTI HIV1/HIV2 rapid antibody test

Not clear

Hackney Borough

40 years

NHS

4%

2012 GBP

QALYs

Yes

Screening is CE

NHS, NIHR

Yes

Barzi et al. [19]

USA

Colorectal cancer

13 screening tools: fecal occult blood test, Flex sig, colonoscopy, CT, DNA.

No screening

US population

35 years

Societal

3%

USD (no year)

Life years gained

No

Colonoscopy is CE

National Cancer Institute Core

Yes

Bleijenberg et al. [13]

Netherlands

Frailty

1. Electronic frailty screening instrument (EFSI)

2. EFSI and nurse-led care program

Usual care

Patients aged 60 or older

1 year

Societal

0%

2012 EUR

QALYs

No

EFSI has high probability of being CE. The combination showed less value for money.

NA

Yes

Cadier et al. [66]

France and USA

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Biannual ultrasound + MRI + CT + biopsy

Real life

Patients with diagnosis of compensated cirrhosis

10 years

Healthcare

4%

2015 (Unknown)

Life years gained

Yes

Biannual ultrasound (gold standard) screening is CE

No funding

Yes

Wrenn et al. [79]

USA

Incidental gallbladder carcinoma

Cholecystectomy

Not clear

Cholecystectomies performed between 06/2009 and 06/2014

NA

NA

NA

NA

ELYs

No

Selective screening based on risk factors of specimen may be a more CE approach.

University of Vermont Medical Center Department of Surgery

Yes

Campos et al. [20]

50 low- and middle-income countries

Cervical cancer

1. Two-dose human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination

2. One-time screening + treatment when neededz3. Cervical cancer treatment

Each other

1. 10-year-old girls2. 35-year-old women3. Women with cervical cancer

Lifetime

Payer

3%

2013 USD

DALYs

No

Both HPV vaccination and screening would be very CE

American Cancer Society

Yes

Chen et al. [45]

China

Hearing loss

Neonatal hearing screening

None

Newborns

15 and 82 years

NA

3%

2012 RMB

2012 RMB

No

Newborn hearing screening and intervention program in Shanghai is justified in terms of the resource input

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Yes

Cheng et al. [76]

China

Hepatitis E

1. Screening (HEV antibody) and vaccination

2. Universal vaccination

No vaccination

60-year-old cohort

16 years

Societal

3%

2016 USD

QALYs

Yes

Screening and vaccination is the most CE hepatitis E intervention strategy

Chinese National Natural Fund

Yes

Chevalier et al. [70]

France

Coronary artery disease

Maximal exercise test (ET)

None

Men aged > 35 years, with more than 2 h a week of training

NA

NA

NA

EUR (no year)

Cardiovascular disease cases

No

ET should be targeted at men with at least two cardiovascular risk factors

None

No

Chowers et al. [21]

Israel

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)

Prenatal HIV screening

Current policy

Newborns

100 years

Payer

4%

NIS (no year)

QALYs

No

Universal prenatal HIV screening is projected to be cost saving in Israel

NA

Yes

Coyle et al. [22]

Canada

Cancer

Computed tomography (CT) scan + occult cancer screening

Cancer screening alone

Patients with unprovoked VTE

12 months

Healthcare

0%

CAD (no year)

QALYs and Missed cancer case

No

CT scan of the abdomen/pelvis for the screening of occult cancer is not CE

Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada

No

Cressman et al. [56]

Canada

Lung cancer

Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT)

Chest radiography

60-year-olds

30 years

Societal

3%

2015 CAD

QALYs

Yes

High-risk lung cancer screening with LDCT is likely to be considered CE

Terry Fox Research Institute

Yes

Crowson et al. [23]

USA

Vestibular schwannomas

Non-contrast screening

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

Full MRI protocol with contrast

Patients with asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss

NA

3rd-party payer

NA

USD (no year)

Useful results (True positives and true negatives)

No

A screening MRI protocol is more CE than a full MRI with contrast

None

No

Devine et al. [24]

Thailand-Myanmar

Perinatal hepatitis B

1. Hepatitis immunoglobulin (HBIG) after rapid diagnostic tests

2. HBIG after confirmatory test

Vaccination alone

Refugee and migrant population on the Thailand-Myanmar border

From first contact to childbirth

Healthcare

NA

USD (no year)

Perinatal infection of Hepatitis B

Yes

HBIG following rapid diagnostic test is CE

Wellcome-Trust Major Overseas Programme in SE Asia

No

Devine et al. [46]

Thailand-Myanmar

Plasmodium vivax

G6PD testing

[1] chloroquine alone

[2] primaquine without screeningz

Refugee and migrant population on the Thailand-Myanmar border

1 year

Healthcare

NA

2014 USD

DALYs

Yes

G6PD RDTs to identify patients with G6PD deficiency before supervised primaquine is likely to provide significant health benefits

Welcome-Trust Major Overseas Programme in SE Asia

Yes

Ditkowsky et al. [25]

USA

Chlamydia trachomatis

Chlamydia screening

No Screening

Pregnant women aged 15–24

1 year

Healthcare

NA

2015 USD

2015 USD

No

Prenatal screening for C. trachomatis resulted in increased expenditure, with a significant reduction in morbidity to woman-infant pairs

None

Yes

Ethgen et al. [14]

France

Hepatitis C (HCV)

1. IFN + RBV + PI for F2–F4

2. IFN-based DAAs for F2–F4

3. All-oral, IFN-free DAAs for F2–F4

4. All-oral, IFN-free DAAs for F0–F4

No intervention

French baby-boomer population (1945–1965 birth cohorts)

20 years

Healthcare

4%

EUR (no year)

QALYs, liver-related deaths

No

HCV screening and access to all-oral DAAs is CE

AbbVie

Yes

Ferguson et al. [69]

Canada

Chronic kidney disease (CKD)

CKD screening

Usual care

Rural Canadian indigenous populations

45 years

Healthcare

5%

2013 CAD

QALYs

Yes

Targeted screening and treatment for CKD is CE

University of Manitoba, CIHR

Yes

Ferrandiz et al. [26]

Spain

Skin cancer

Clinical teleconsultations (CTC)

CTC + dermoscopic teleconsultation

Patients visiting 5 participating primary care centers because of concern over lesions suggestive of skin cancer

NA

NA

NA

EUR (no year)

Detected cases

No

Dermoscopic images improve the results of an internet-based skin cancer screening system

Health Council of the Regional Government of Andalusia-Spain

No

Goede et al. [27]

Canada

Colorectal cancer (CRC)

Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT)

Guaiac fecal occult blood testing and no screening

40-year-old screening participants at average risk of CRC

Varied (20 to 45 years)

Healthcare

3%

2013 CAD

QALYs

Yes

FIT was the most CE strategy

Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care

Yes

Gray et al. [47]

UK

Breast cancer

1. Risk 1

2. Risk 2

3. Masking

4. Risk 1 + masking

No screening

Women eligible for a National Breast Screening Program (NBSP)

Lifetime

NHS

4%

2014 GBP

QALYs

Yes

Risk stratified NBSPs were relatively CE compared to the UK NBSP

FP7-HEALTH-2012-INNOVATION-1

Yes

Gupta et al. [28]

USA

Cystic lung disease

High-resolution computed tomographic (HRCT) imaging

no HRCT screening

Patients with Spontaneous Pneumothorax

NA

Societal

3%

2014 USD

QALYs

Yes

HRCT image screening is CE

None

Yes

Haukaas et al. [44]

Norway

Tuberculosis (TB)

1. TST + IGRA

2. IGRA

3. IGRA for risk

No screening

Immigrants under 35 years of age from countries with a high incidence of TB

10 years

Healthcare

4%

2013 EUR

Avoided TB cases

Yes

IGRA is the optimal algorithm at a threshold above €28,400

None

No

Heidari et al. [29]

Iran

Hearing loss

1. AABR

2. OAE

Each other

Newborns

1 year

Healthcare

NA

IRR (no year)

Detected cases

No

AABR is the CE alternative compared to OAE

I.R. Iran’s National Institute of Health Research

No

Horn et al. [30]

USA

Substance abuse

1. Minimal screening

2. Screening, assessment and referral

3. 2 + brief intervention and follow-up

Each other

Patients from emergency departments of 6 clinical sites across the US

1 year

NA

NA

2013 USD

2013 USD

No

Resources could be better utilized supporting other health interventions.

NA

Yes

Htet et al. [71]

Myanmar

Pulmonary tuberculosis

Interventional model

Conventional model

Household contacts

5 months

NA

NA

USD (no year)

Detected cases

Yes

The interventional model was more CE than the modified conventional model.

NA

No

Hunter et al. [31]

USA

Breast cancer

Digital breast tomosynthesis

Full-field digital mammography

Patients undergoing screening mammography

1 year

NA

NA

2014 USD

Cancer detected

No

DBT is a cost-equivalent or potentially CE alternative to FFDM

NA

No

John et al. [48]

India

Glaucoma

Community screening

No screening

people aged 40–69 years in urban areas in India

10 years

Healthcare

3%

2015 INR

Additional treated cases, QALYs

Yes

A community screening program is likely to be CE

NZAID Commonwealth Scholarship

Yes

Keller et al. [68]

Australia

Prostate cancer

Serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) test every 2 years

Opportunistic screening

Australian male cohort aged between 50 and 69 years.

20 years

Healthcare

5%

2015 AUD

QALYs

Yes

PSA-based screening is not CE

University of Queensland

Yes

Kievit et al. [32]

Netherlands

Cardiovascular (CV) disease

CV risk profiling

No screening

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

10 years

Medical

4% for costs and 1.5% for outcomes

EUR (no year)

QALYs

No

Screening for CV events in RA patients was estimated to be CE

NA

Yes

Kim et al. [49]

South Korea

Hepatitis C

One-time screening

No screening

People aged 40–70

5 years

Healthcare

5%

USD (no year)

QALYs

Yes

HCV screening and treatment is likely to be highly CE

Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals

Yes

Kim et al. [63]

USA

Human Papillomavirus

1. Cytology

2. HPV test

3. Co-test

Each other

US women

10–44 years

Societal

3%

USD (no year)

QALYs

No

Screening can be modified to start at later ages and at lower frequencies

National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health

No

Lapointe-Shaw et al. [72]

USA

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae

Rectal swab screening

No screening

65-year-old patients admitted to a general medical inpatient service.

19.2 years

US Hospital

3%

2016 USD

QALYs

Yes

Screening inpatients for CPE carriage is likely CE

None

No

Lew et al. [58]

Australia

Colorectal cancer

Projected iFOBT screening

No screening

People aged 50–74

24 years

Health services

5%

2015 AUD

Life years gained

No

The program is highly CE

Cancer Institute NSW and Cancer Council NSW

Yes

Liow et al. [77]

USA

Bone malignancies

Routine femoral head histopathology

None

Patients that underwent primary total hip arthroplasty

4 years

NA

NA

2016 USD

QALYs

Yes

Routine femoral head histopathology may be CE

NA

Yes

Mo et al. [15]

China

Cervical cancer

1. Liquid-based cytology test + HPV DNA test

2. Pap smear cytology test + HPV DNA test

3. Visual inspection with acetic acid

No intervention

Adolescent girls (Above 12 years old)

Lifetime

Societal

3%

2015 USD

QALYs

Yes

The HPV4/9 vaccine with current screening strategies was highly CE

Japan Society for the Promotion of Sciences

Yes

Morton et al. [50]

UK

Breast cancer

Mammography

No screening

Females over 45 years old

20 years

NHS

4%

2016 GBP

QALYs

Yes

Calculations suggested that breast cancer screening is CE

NA

Yes

Mullie et al. [51]

Canada and USA

Latent tuberculosis

1. Tuberculin skin test

2. QuantiFERON®-TB-Gold In-Tube

Each other

Healthcare workers

20 years

Healthcare

3%

2015 CAD

QALYs

Yes

Annual tuberculosis screening appears poorly CE

McGill University, CIHR

Yes

Petry et al. [16]

Germany

Human papillomavirus

1. HPV test followed by Pap cytology

2. HPV test followed by cytology

3. HPV test followed by colposcopy

4. Co-testing with HPV and Pap

Pap cytology

Women aged 30–65

10 years

NA

3%

EUR (no year)

Avoided deaths

No

The greatest clinical impact was achieved with primary HPV screening (with genotyping) followed by colposcopy

Hoffmann-La Roche

Yes

Phisalprapa et al. [33]

Thailand

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Ultrasonography screening

No screening

50-year-old metabolic syndrome patients

Lifetime

Societal

3%

2014 USD

QALYs

Yes

Ultrasonography screening for NAFLD with intensive weight reduction program is CE

NA

Yes

Pil et al. [59]

Belgium

Skin Cancer

Total body skin examination (TBSE)

Lesion-directed screening

Belgian population over 18 years of age

50 years

Societal

Outcomes at 1.5% and costs at 3%

EUR (no year)

QALYs

Yes

1-time TBSE is the most CE strategy

The LEO Foundation and the Belgian Federation Against Cancer

Yes

Prusa et al. [80]

Austria

Toxoplasmosis

Prenatal screening

No screening

Birth cohorts from 1992 to 2008 and

20 years

Societal

3%

2012 Euro

Life and productivity loss

No

Cost savings of prenatal screening for toxoplasmosis and treatment are outstanding

None

Yes

Requena-Mendez et al. [34]

All Europe

Chagas disease

T. cruzi serological screening

No screening

Latin American adults living in Europe

Lifetime

Healthcare

3%

EUR (no year)

QALYs

YES

Screening for Chagas disease in asymptomatic Latin American adults living in Europe is a CE strategy.

European Commission 7th Framework Program

Yes

Roberts et al. [60]

Australia

Rheumatic heart disease

Echocardiographic screening

Screening every other year and no screening

Indigenous Australian Children

40 years

Healthcare

5%

2013 AUD

DALYs, heart failure, surgery

Yes

Echocardiographic screening is CE assuming that RHD can be detected ≥ 2 years earlier by screening

University of Western Australia

Yes

Rodriguez-Perez et al. [64]

Spain

Type 2 diabetes

DIABSCORE

HbA1c or blood glucose

Adult primary care patients in Spain

NA

NA

NA

EUR (no year)

Cases detected

No

DIABSCORE is a CE and valid method for opportunistic screening of type 2 diabetes

Carlos III Health Institute

No

Saito et al. [35]

Japan

Gastric cancer

ABC method: HPA and measuring serum PG concentrations

Annual endoscopic screening

50-year-old Japanese individuals who have high gastric cancer incidence and mortality who had not undergone H. pylori eradication

30 years

Healthcare

2%

2014 USD

Lives saved and QALYs

Yes

ABC method cost less and saved more lives

Niigata University of Health and Welfare

Yes

Schiller-Fruehwirth et al. [36]

Austria

Breast cancer

1. Organized screening

2. Opportunistic screening

No screening

40-year-old asymptomatic women

Lifetime

Healthcare

3%

2012 EUR

Life years gained

Yes

The decision to adopt organized screening is likely an efficient use of limited health care resources in Austria

Main Association of Social Security Institutions

Yes

Selvapatt et al. [65]

UK

Hepatitis C

HCV testing

No screening

All persons attending a London DTU

Lifetime

Healthcare

4%

2013 GBP

ELYs, QALYs

Yes

Concludes cost effectiveness of outreach testing and treatment of hepatitis

Biomedical Research Council to Imperial College Department of Hepatology

Yes

Sharma et al. [61]

Lebanon

Cervical cancer

1. Cytology

2. HPV DNA screen

No screening

Women aged 25–65 years

NA

Societal

3%

I$ (no year)

Years of life saved

Yes

Increasing coverage to 50% with extended screening intervals provides greater health benefits

None

Yes

Smit et al. [73]

Belgium

Tuberculosis

X-ray screening

No screening

Risk groups: prisoners, youth in detention centers, undocumented migrants

1 year

Flemish Agency for Care and Health

0%

2013–14 EUR

Detected cases

No

Tuberculosis screening is relatively expensive

Flemish Agency for Care and Health

No

Ten Haaf et al. [52]

Canada

Lung cancer

Computer tomography

No screening

Persons born between 1940 and 1969

Lifetime

Healthcare

3%

2015 CAD

Life years gained, false positive screen

Yes

Lung cancer screening with stringent smoking eligibility criteria can be CE

Clinical Evaluative Sciences

Yes

Teng et al. [62]

New Zealand

Helicobacter pylori infection, gastric cancer

1. Fecal antigen

2. Serology

Current practice

Total population and targeted Māori (25–69 years old)

Lifetime

Healthcare

3%

2011 USD

QALYs

Yes

Screening was likely to be CE particularly for indigenous populations

Health Research Council of New Zealand

Yes

Tjalma et al. [37]

Belgium

Cervical cancer

Dual stain cytology

Cytology

Women between 25 and 65 years of age

60 years

Healthcare

NA

EUR (no year)

QALYs

Yes

Diagnostic cytology benefits all stakeholders involved in cervical cancer screening

NA

Yes

Tufail et al. [38]

UK

Diabetic retinopathy

Automated diabetic retinopathy image assessment systems (ARIAS)

Human graders

Patients with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus who attended their annual visit at the diabetes eye-screening program

NA

NHS

4%

2013–2014 GBP

Appropriate screening outcome

No

ARIAS have the potential to reduce costs and to aid delivery of DR screening

Novartis

No

Meulen et al. [39]

Netherlands

Colorectal cancer (CRC)

1. Fecal immunology test

2. gFOBT

3. Sigmoidoscopy

Each other

Screening-naive subjects ages 50 to 74 years, living in the southwest of the Netherlands

Lifetime

Healthcare

3%

2012 EUR

Positivity rates, detection of adenoma and CRC, QALYs

Yes

Screening stratified by gender is not more CE than uniform FIT screening

NA

Yes

van Katwyk et al. [53]

Canada

Diabetic retinopathy

Extended coverage of diabetic eye examination

Usual care

Prince Edward Island residents over 45 years of age who had diabetes

30 years

Healthcare

5%

2015 CAD

QALYs

Yes

Extending public health coverage to eye examinations by optometrists is CE

CIHR

Yes

van Luijt et al. [67]

Norway

Breast cancer

Mammography

No screening

Norway female population

Lifetime

Societal

4%

2014 NOK

QALYs

No

The NBCSP is a highly CE measure to reduce breast cancer specific mortality

Research Council Norway

Yes

Wang et al. [17]

China

Chronic kidney disease

1. Day 1

2. Random

3. Day 1 + random

4. Day 1+ random + day 2

Each other

Outpatients admitted to Peking University First Hospital from January 2013 to January 2014

30 years

Societal

5%

CNY (no year)

QALYs

Yes

Combining two first morning urine samples and one randomized spot urine sample is CE

National Key Technology R&D Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology

Yes

Welton et al. [40]

England and Wales

Atrial fibrillation

1. Single systematic population screen

2. Single systematic opportunistic screen

No screening

General population in England and Wales

Lifetime

NHS

4%

2015 GBP

QALYs

Yes

Population-based screening is likely to be CE

NIHR

Yes

Whittington et al. [74]

USA

Staphylococcus aureus infection

1. Universal decolonization

2. Targeted decolonization

3. Screening and isolation

Each other

Hypothetical cohort of adults admitted to the Intensive care unit.

1 year

Hospital

NA

2015 USD

QALYs

Yes

This study supports updating the standard practice to a decolonization approach.

NA

No

Williams et al. [41]

USA

Prosthetic joint infection

1. 4 swabs decolonization

2. 2 swabs

3. Nasal swab alone

No screening and decolonization

Hip and knee replacement patients

NA

Societal

NA

2016 USD

Cases of prosthetic joint infections

No

The 2-swab and universal-decolonization strategy were most CE

None

Yes

Yang et al. [54]

Taiwan

Lung cancer

1. Computed tomography (CT)

2. Radiography

No screening

Smokers between 55 and 75 years of age

Lifetime

Healthcare

3%

2013 USD

QALYs

Yes

Low-dose CT screening for lung cancer among high-risk smokers would be CE in Taiwan

Ministry of Science and Technology, and the National Cheng Kung University Hospital

Yes

Yarnoff et al. [42]

USA

Chronic kidney disease (CKD)

CKD risk scores

No screening

US population

Lifetime

Healthcare

3%

2010 USD

QALYs

Yes

CKD risk scores may allow clinicians to cost-effectively identify a broader population for CKD screening

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Yes

Yoshimura et al. [78]

Japan

Osteoporosis

Screening and alendronate therapy

No screening and no therapy

Postmenopausal women over 60 years

5 years

Healthcare

3%

USD (no year)

QALYs

Yes

Screening and treatment would be CE for Japanese women over 60 years.

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology

Yes

Zimmermann et al. [43]

Kenya

Cervical cancer

1. Visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA)

2. Papanicolaou smear

3. Testing for human papillomavirus (HPV)

Cryotherapy without screening

Hypothetical cohort of 38-year-old women

Lifetime

Societal

3%

2014 USD

ELYs

No

VIA was most CE unless HPV could be reduced to a single visit

NA

Yes

  1. QALYs quality-adjusted life years, ELYs expected life years, RMB Renminbi, USD United States dollar, CAD Canadian dollar, AUD Australian dollar, EUR euro; GBP British pound, NIS Israeli new shekel, IRR Iranian rial, CNY Chinese yuan, INR Indian rupee, NOK Norwegian krone, CE cost-effective, NA not applicable