Workforce Resources for Health in Developing Countries

With increased globalization and interdependence among countries, sustained health worker migration and the complex threats of rapidly spreading infectious diseases, as well as changing lifestyles, a strong health workforce is essential. Building the human resources for health should not only include healthcare professionals like physicians and nurses, but must take into consideration community health workers, mid-level workers and strengthened primary healthcare systems to increase coverage and address the basic health needs of societies. This is especially true in low and middle-income countries where healthcare access is a critical challenge. There is a global crisis in the health workforce, expressed in acute shortages and maldistribution of health workers, geographically and professionally. This massive global shortage, though imprecise quantitatively, is estimated at more than 4 million workers. To respond to this crisis, policies and actions are needed to address the dynamics of the health labour market and the production and management of the health workforce, and to strengthen the performance of existing health systems. Schools of public health need to develop the range of capacity and leadership in addition to the traditional training of healthcare managers and researchers. Countries should fi rst identify their health problems in order to properly address their health worker needs, retention, recruitment and training, if they are to come close to reaching the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) for health.


INTRODUCTION
The mobilization and strengthening of human resources for health has been neglected in many countries, but remains a key ingredient in combating health crises in some of the world's poorest countries, and for building sustainable health systems.The challenges faced in optimizing human resources for health are numerous, starting with the need to identify basic healthcare issues globally and nationally, and fi nding ways to provide integrated care.Geographical variation needs to be addressed, with large disparities in the workforce between and also within countries. 1ountries with poor economies and weak healthcare infrastructure are likely to also be the ones with the most inadequate human resources for health.Such countries tend to have the greatest diffi culty in developing the resources to build the capacity of and expand the absolute numbers of health workers.The number of professionals trained in medical and nursing schools and the number of health managers and researchers trained in the schools of public health may be inadequate.Just as important, there may be inadequate numbers of mid-level workers, lay community health workers, midwives and other healthcare providers.The mix of professional and nonprofessional healthcare workers is another consideration.][4] A major challenge in the new millennium is the retention of health workers, not only in poorer countries, but also within any country in remote and rural areas.][7] The phenomenon of inadequate numbers of doctors internationally, exacerbated by the maldistribution of doctors who are over-represented in the private sector, in cities and in wealthier countries, has left those in most need (poor, rural, and marginalized individuals and groups) underserved.The World Health Organization indicates that about 4 million health workers are needed globally.The number of healthcare workers per thousand population in 2006 was estimated to be 2.9/1000 in Africa; 5.8/1000 in Southeast Asia; 14.9/1000 in the Americas (North and South) and 40.3/1000 in Europe. 8However, the quality of data -in particular, the poor state of health information system data on human resources in lowincome countries -has meant that estimates vary. 9Data are hard to compare, as estimates vary depending on how the term "health worker" is defi ned, and summary fi gures, in particular composite regional data, obscure the within and between country differences.The pattern, however, is clear: low resource settings have a very high population-to-provider ratio.Undersupply of health professionals is not uniform; in countries that make up the Central Asian Commonwealth of Independent States, it is the quality rather than number of providers -as well as the hospital-centric focus of the health system -that is the challenge.
Africa comprises some 11 percent of the world population, yet accounts for 25 percent of the global burden of disease and hosts just 4 percent of the global health workforce to address this. 8,10There are urgent health needs in the region: Of the 20 countries with the highest maternal mortality rates in the world, 19 are in Africa; eleven of the 15 countries with the highest incidence of tuberculosis are in Africa; malaria is endemic in 42 of the 46 member states of the WHO Africa Region, and accounts for over 90 percent of estimated clinical cases worldwide.Two-thirds of the world's people living with HIV, and 72 percent of AIDS deaths occur in Africa. 11,12The continent faces an extreme human health resource shortage estimated at 720,000 physicians and 670,000 nurses. 13n this article, we fi rst sketch the nature of change in the burden of illness experienced by many middle-and low-income countries, followed by comments on key issues affecting the performance of health systems.In response to the challenge of inadequate health workforce numbers and distribution, there is a trend to consider alternative cadres who can deal effectively with common health problems and improve access to services in both rich and poor countries.In particular, we focus on two alternatives to professional medical and nursing practitioners: community health and midlevel workers as essential primary healthcare (PHC) providers.A case study of Nigeria illustrates the enormous challenges to the health workforce that faces developing countries more generally.

Changing burden of illness and the dynamics of health transition
A growing body of research attests to the changing burden of illness in sub-Saharan Africa.While the unfi nished agenda of infection, malnutrition and maternal complications persists in a diversity of settings, longstanding malaria, and the recent and extensive upsurge in HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis 14 is paralleled by the emergence of chronic vascular disease, diabetes, cancers and lower respiratory conditions, which now constitute the commonest causes of death.Equally, the range of accidents and injuries is prominent, as is growing recognition of mental illness and its consequences. 15,16aken together, this profi le characterizes a complex, changing pattern of illness that imposes a signifi cant burden on households and communities, and which -through a mix of chronic infectious and non-communicable diseases -places quite unfamiliar challenges on health and social systems.

Health systems and access to care
Health systems and the delivery of PHC appear to have weakened over the past 2 decades. 17While no single issue is solely responsible, a number of longstanding insults can be singled out.The macroeconomic context of increased debt since the late 1970s consequent on the oil crisis, a focus on debt repayment, decreasing investment in social institutions, and an erroneous belief in the limited role of the state and the importance of the private sector, form the backdrop against which the state of current health systems must be seen.
Poor human resource management is a widespread and critical factor, with the effects of accumulated managerial and clinical care defi ciencies clearly apparent.This is underpinned by excessive levels of health worker migration -from the public to the private sector, rural to urban settings, or to more welcoming and lucrative destinations abroad. 18oday, there is unusual fl ux in health systems thinking, a product of weak systems performance, coupled with disappointing progress in meeting disease reduction targets, and refl ected -certainly in sub-Saharan Africawith the recognition that much of the continent will fall far short of its Millennium Development Goals.Similarly, there is a growing consensus on the vital importance of a functioning health systems platform as the foundation for the delivery of programs and interventions, irrespective of their specifi c foci. 19,20mplications for primary healthcare These challenges -a still-evolving and complex burden of illness and concerns with health systems development and performance -refocus attention on PHC.Restoring focus on health systems strengthening and effective PHC is central to the World Health Organization's current phase of work.This is emphasized in statements by the Director-General, Margaret Chan 21 ; in the Organization's 2008 World Health Report -Primary Health Care: Now more than ever 22 ; and the fi ndings of two recent high-level commissions: the WHO Commission on Macroeconomics and Health and the WHO Commission on the Social Determinants of Health. 23,24 imilarly, recent fi ndings of the Disease Control Priorities Project underline the costeffectiveness of quality primary healthcare -highly relevant given the pressures on national spending in the wake of the current global recession. 25,26ith greater recognition of the limitations and unintended consequences of vertical, unifocal disease-oriented programs, particularly in eroding or failing to develop the primary care infrastructure, the call for integrated health programming -in childhood and adult illness, chronic disease, maternal and reproductive health, HIV and tuberculosis care -is becoming clearer.Such integrated care systems, still warranting concerted research and development, will depend by defi nition on adequately functioning primary care delivery platforms. 14,27In part, this may be achievable by recognition of this need by international donor agencies, and by the concerted action of national governments.
The part of the health system that needs 're-engineering' is the way in which the system interacts with households and communities so that health services can impact positively on population health.Notably, with the rise of chronic conditions, reorienting care systems to achieve continuity of care is vital.This will require a changed relationship between health workers and patients, with mutual respect and service-client partnership a key to successful clinical outcomes.These greater demands on health workers only exacerbate the critical shortage of human resources for health.In response, not only must existing systems change, but the role of additional cadres is high on the international agenda. 28,29

COMMUNITY-BASED HEALTH WORKERS: AN ALTERNATIVE
Community-based health workers (CHWs) are referred to by a variety of names, such as health auxiliaries, health volunteers, health promoters, family welfare educators, village health workers, and community lay health aides.Regardless of name, they are involved in providing preventive medical services, monitoring the community's health, identifying patients at particular risk, and perhaps even providing basic curative services.Their use is a model which is widely implemented by many countries as a vital part of management of specifi c diseases, such as tuberculosis, malaria and others, with important potential, even in industrialized countries, for specifi c tasks such as in tuberculosis management using DOTS (Directly Observed Therapy, Short-course), and in management of chronic diseases.
Clearly, CHWs do not function independently or in a vacuum.While voluntary work may in some situations be workable, it generally runs the risk of being poorly integrated with the formal health system, poorly supported, and taken for granted by service managers -with obvious consequences for effectiveness and sustainability.Further, it often undervalues the efforts, time and cost that voluntary workers provide (often themselves from poor communities), and makes regulating their work and ensuring quality diffi cult.
An effective PHC team, responsible for a defi ned community and (generally) working from a health centre base, must have the capacity to: link clinical care with prevention-oriented community mobilisation; manage and support patients close to their homes; and bridge actions needed across sectors (such as agriculture, transport, local government, education, welfare, natural resources and labour).To these should be added the familiar requirements of cultural appropriateness in respect of local beliefs, customs and language.
No matter how hardworking, these conditions will not be fulfi lled by traditional doctor-nurse teams, subject to conventional hierarchies, nor by the growing range of mid-level workers.Rather, it is sizeable numbers of well-trained and supported CHWs, integrated into properly functioning PHC teams that are an additional, essential element to meet the healthcare needs of communities.The WHO advocates such an approach in resourcelimited settings for providing antiretroviral treatment against HIV. 29

Recent CHW experience
Recent experience tends to bear out these assertions.The decline in enthusiasm for CHW programs in the 1980s was due to problems, such as "unrealistic expectations, poor initial planning, problems of sustainability, and the diffi culties of maintaining quality" experienced by large-scale and national programs. 30,31Yet CHW programmes have re-emerged globally, mainly to address shortages in qualifi ed health workers in many countries.][34] Several studies have shown that CHWs can provide excellent care to HIV/AIDS patients.A study conducted in Kampala, Uganda demonstrated that a comprehensive community-based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) program using peer health workers and nurses provided very good AIDS care, including good virologic outcomes. 35Data from a study from Free State Province, South Africa, showed that the availability of treatment buddies, CHWs and support groups was the most important predictor of treatment success (assessed by CD4 cell count and viral load) throughout the fi rst two years of treatment. 36HWs are also gaining support in managing other communicable diseases such as malaria and tuberculosis.For example, rapid diagnostic tests for malaria were accepted and easily used by CHWs in Lusaka Province, Zambia in 2006, resulting in timely detection and the avoidance of overtreatment. 37Further, there is good evidence that CHWs can undertake various tasks contributing to child survival.The case management of childhood illness and delivery of preventive interventions such as immunisation are good examples. 30,38,39 study in the Western Cape Province, South Africa, concluded that lay health workers achieved better outcomes for patients with considerable cost saving when compared with clinic-based care.Trained CHWs were able to improve the treatment success rate among tuberculosis patients in a well-established health service despite a reduction in the range of services available.40 A recent updated systematic review of 82 randomised controlled trials on the effectiveness of lay health workers in a variety of settings showed that they provide promising benefi ts in promoting immunization uptake and breastfeeding practices, improving TB treatment outcomes, and in reducing child morbidity and mortality when compared to usual care.38

MID-LEVEL WORKERS
Mid-level workers (MLWs) are certifi cated individuals who are not doctors but have been trained to "diagnose and treat common health problems, to manage emergencies, to refer appropriately and to transfer the seriously ill or injured for further care." 41Many titles are given to this type of healthcare provider, depending on which country they work in.][44] While there is an assumption by some that MLWs are a cheap and easy solution to the needs of poorer people in low-and middle-income countries, this is not borne out by international experience.MLWs are a contemporary and international phenomenon.In the US, physician assistants (PAs) complement the work of doctors in carrying out minor surgery, tasks in general practice and emergency care and administering anaesthesia.Indeed, this is a well-established cadre of worker introduced in the 1960s and there are currently over 140 accredited PA training programs in the US, 53 percent of them having been established between 1993 and 2002. 45The US experience has infl uenced thinking in the United Kingdom, where this cadre has been introduced more recently. 46Canada too is considering extending the role of similar providers -active in some Canadian provinces and the Canadian army -into the national health system more generally. 47imilarly, in Australia, the introduction of PAs is being piloted. 48,49Clinical offi cers have formed the backbone of primary care in East Africa for some 30-40 years, with over 10,000 trained in Uganda, Tanzania and Kenya. 50LWs are also re presented in large numbers in Southeast Asia. 422][53][54] For instance, Zambia plans to increase numbers from 1000 to 2600; Lesotho to raise the annual graduation rate of nurse offi cers by 42 percent; and Ghana to double its output of medical assistants in the next 2 years.Ethiopia has produced a 'fl ooding and retention' strategy, and accelerated training to increase the number of health offi cers and extension workers to 5000 by 2010. 50raining of MLWs varies.Those that enter this fi eld with pre-existing medical training (mostly nurses), receive top-up training which can be very short, although the length of training for those who will take on generalist roles is about one year.People who enter directly into the category receive training that ranges from 2 to 4 years and in most cases, undertake some kind of supervised clerical placement where they hone their skills; this may be during their training or afterwards in the form of a supervised internship. 42or many common conditions, effective, cost-effi cient interventions exist that, if more widely implemented, would signifi cantly decrease preventable mortality in Africa and Asia. 55,56The attraction of MLWs is that they can improve health service coverage and provide good quality care.In contrast to doctors and nurses, MLWs currently are less able to migrate as they do not hold a transferable qualifi cation.The potential of MLWs to improve access, provide quality care and to remain in areas where they are needed, is explored below.We then discuss the potential of this category of worker to impact on population health.

Improved access to care
For many low resource countries, MLWs are the backbone of the health service.Research into the contribution of mid-level providers indicates that they do indeed improve access to care for underserved populations in both developed and developing countries. 57,58MLWs have made trauma care more accessible in the US and increased access to reproductive health services, in particular abortion services, in a number of countries in the developed and developing world. 59,60Wide access to HIV treatment in Africa was achieved through the use of MLWs and in some instances, people with even less formal training. 61,62

Quality of care
The assertion that providers other than doctors can provide care of equivalent quality has been investigated.A systematic review of nurse-led primary care demonstrated that nurses achieve health outcomes equal to those of general practitioners with good patient satisfaction. 63In relation to chronic disease care, a Cochrane review concluded that nurses "can even replace physicians in delivering many aspects of diabetes care if detailed management protocols are available or if they receive training." 64Comparing nurse-led with usual (doctor-led) care, outcomes showed improved glycaemic control, lower mortality and fewer complications. 65However, a randomised trial indicated that nurse practitioners supplement rather than substitute for doctors with whom they work, while providing a wider range of services. 66here is less systematic evidence available on the quality of care provided in low resource settings.In a retrospective cohort analysis of patients in a Mozambican HAART program, outcomes were similar for MLWs and doctors.Based on pharmacy records, patients were more likely to have made a quarterly visit if managed by a MLW and to demonstrate optimal adherence six months after starting therapy.Often, the proximity of MLWs to the population served to enhance access to healthcare.Rwanda transferred several tasks from physicians to nurses trained in HIV management, while the physicians took on more supervisory and mentoring roles.Improvement in CD4 count, correct prescriptions, patient monitoring and overall survival were similar between nurses and physicians. 67n Malawi , clinical offi cers conducted 93 percent of major obstetric operations in government hospitals with no signifi cant differences in post-operative outcome, well-being, stillbirths or neonatal mortality, when compared with medical offi cers.Evaluations of the performance of MLWs in Mozambique showed no signifi cant difference in outcome when compared to medical specialists. 42In some instances in Malawi, outcomes were equally poor, with the same low proportion of doctors (20 percent) and MLWs (22 percent) using an adequate diagnostic process when examining children under 5 years old. 68][71] There a re data to indicate that MLWs are an effi cient as well as effective investment.Surgery by MLWs in Mozambique produced the same outcome as doctors whose training cost ten times that of the técnicos de cirugía.MLWs trained to deliver a service with shorter instruction were found to perform those tasks confi dently in district services where there is less specialist support.Junior doctors sent to rural hospitals in Mozambique were dependant on senior medical support for longer periods compared to assistant medical offi cers. 72A fi nancial model developed by Chung demonstrated that 942 hours of nurse time freed up 737 hours of physician time, which could then be expended on more complex cases in non-HIV fi elds, providing increased physician capacity for the health system as a whole. 67hile more evidence is desirable, there seems to be no reason to discard the idea that, for a number of health conditions, MLWs can provide equivalent quality care to doctors.MLWs with appropriate and adequate training who are provided with continued support and supervision can indeed provide care comparable to medical professionals. 42Such training and support, however, is not guaranteed in low resource settings.

Retention and migration
Issues of retention and migration have not been a feature of research in developed countries.Here we review what is known in low resource settings.One study has confi rmed that MLWs are more likely to remain in service in comparison to doctors.Seven years after the graduation of técnicos de cirugía in Mozambique, more than 80 percent were still working at district hospitals, whereas nearly all the medical doctors posted there had left within three years. 73Anyone visiting health centres in Africa will meet dedicated clinical offi cers in remote settings who have been working there for decades.But there is little published data on retention and migration of these staff.There is also data indicating that, while in their health posts, they may spend signifi cant time engaged in other activities to supplement their salaries, including private fee-for-service care. 74here is an assumption that MLWs require less investment than medical professionals, and will tolerate low salaries and poor living and working conditions.This approach is short-sighted.In the Pacifi c region, low pay was associated with diffi culties in retention, 41 and poor supervision and lack of training opportunities appeared responsible for attrition of this cadre. 42,75If MLWs can provide some answers to the health needs of populations, it seems important to invest adequately in them, but they may have a lesser tendency to emigrate than doctors.

Impact on population health
There is, however, reason to be cautious about the degree to which MLWs alone may impact on population health in low-and middle-income countries.Addressing the social determinants of health is essential and often ignored or may even be undermined, such as when -in several settings -water supply was privatised and rendered too expensive. 24,76Without concomitant investment in programs and processes to address the social determinants of health, it is unrealistic to expect a single category of health worker to make the health impact that is required.
Secondly, in countries with less well functioning health systems, existing staff may work in situations where salaries are so low they do not earn a living wage and thus engage in other activities to meet their basic needs.Moreover, there tends to be frustration with bureaucratic procedures, infl exible planning and shortages of equipment, medications and supplies. 13][79] Even though this cadre has been in existence in Africa for over 30 years, there is still no recognised career path for MLWs, and their level of expertise and qualifi cation is not routinely linked to pay levels. 42These factors affect the motivation of health workers, which is linked to the quality of care they provide. 80If care is inadequate because of lack of supplies or underperforming staff, it is unlikely that a positive impact on population health will result.Unless these issues are addressed, it is unclear how introducing new, albeit additional, staff into the health system will make the expected contribution.Fascination with the notion of a 'magic bullet' -a quick single intervention to solve all problems -has undermined the development of health systems in poor countries.Where health systems have developed effectively, features have included "sustained investments for many decades in health infrastructure, capacity building of personnel and in improving the organizational and managerial effi ciency". 81

NIGERIA: A CASE-STUDY
Nigeria is the most populous country in sub-Saharan Africa, with a population of almost 150 million people. 82It is a multi-ethnic country with Ibo, Yoruba and Hausa being the three major ethnic groups.Nigeria has 36 states with a Federal Capital Territory in Abuja.There are 774 local government areas.The Nigerian health system includes orthodox, alternative and traditional systems of healthcare delivery.
There are three levels of orthodox healthcare delivery: primary, secondary and tertiary.The country has a young population (i.e., 45 percent under 15 years of age) and a disease profi le of both developed (non-communicable disease) and developing (communicable disease) countries -the increasingly common 'double burden'.There is no functional national health insurance.Of total health expenditures, government covers 25.5 percent, while private expenditure comprises the remaining 74.5 percent, and 91 percent of private expenditures are out-of-pocket. 83n the formal health sector, a PHC approach drives national health policy.Following the Declaration of Alma-Ata, there were serious attempts at health system reform, based on the principles of PHC and resulting in the National Health Policy of 1988.However, the policy failed to create a unifi ed system of care or address fi nance and staffi ng for competent local leadership. 84he National Health Policy (dev eloped in 1984, adopted in 1988 and revised in 2004) establishes PHC as the framework to improve services for the population.The policy intends that a comprehensive healthcare system, delivered through health centres, be the main thrust for achieving good population health status.In practice, however, priority is given to curative services, with poor funding of preventive healthcare and a lack of strong leadership to drive a PHC approach, with consequent low levels of coverage.This is refl ected in indicators such as immunization rates which are below 70 percent for measles, mumps and rubella (MMR).Maternal mortality rates are 1100/10,000 live births, and contraceptive prevalence is 13 percent. 85The priority given to curative services fails to address the basic health problems of the country, which require the application of well known and cost-effective public health programmes. 86ccording to National Health Po licy, comprehensive care delivered through the primary health centres should include maternal, newborn and child health and family planning.However, these centres are largely understaffed with medications and supplies often out of stock.Improvement in key health indicators has been slow and today Nigeria ranks among countries with the highest child and maternal mortality rates.Major contributors to the national disease burden are malaria, tuberculosis (TB) and HIV/AIDS.
Malaria is a major health and developmental problem, with a prevalence of 919 cases per 100,000 population.It is by far the most important cause of morbidity and mortality in infants and young children: about 75 percent of malaria deaths occur in children under 5 and one in ten maternal deaths is due to malaria. 86The HIV/AIDS epidemic unfolded on a large scale in Nigeria with an estimated adult prevalence of 3.6 percent; nearly 3.0 million people are living with the virus.In 2009 alone, there were about 192,000 AIDS related deaths. 87Tuberculosis cases increased dramatically with the onset of HIV/AIDS, with an estimated prevalence of 521 cases per 100,000 population in 2007.About 27 percent of adults with tuberculosis are also infected with HIV. 88Unlike most of sub-Saharan Africa, rural areas in Nigeria have a higher HIV/AIDS prevalence than urban areas. 86

The health workforce in Nigeria
Nigeria has high numbers of healthcare providers, who together make up the largest human resource for health in Africa.In 2007, there were 52,408 doctors, 128,918 nurses, and 90,489 midwives registered, which translates into about 35 doctors and 86 nurses per 100,000 population. 86This compares with the sub-Saharan average of 15 doctors and 72 nurses per 100,000 population. 11 large proportion of the health workforce is in the commercial city of Lagos.Efforts have been made to redistribute the workforce so that it is more equitably spread.About 60 percent of the states in Nigeria provide incentives to health workers that volunteer to serve in rural areas, while others make rural service a condition for certain promotions.There is the National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) that is mandatory for all new university and polytechnic graduates.
Hitherto, nurses and midwives did not participate in the one-year service because their training was not university-based.However, to ensure that nursing and midwifery services are available in all villages and towns, nurses and midwives will now fulfi l the mandatory one year national service, a recommendation of the committee established to reduce maternal mortality. 84A new initiative of the current administration re-engages retired, registered nurse-midwives still fi t to work, to provide midwifery services, particularly in rural areas, in a bid to bring down the high maternal mortality rates.

Health workforce production
Health workers are produced in designated training institutions.These institutions are poorly distributed in favour of southern parts of the country.Furthermore, nursing and midwifery schools have limited the enrollment of new students to 50 per annum in an effort to ensure that standards are maintained.
Workers are produced at various educational levels including certifi cate, diploma, graduate and postgraduate.The minimum qualifi cation for formal registration as a health worker is graduate-level training.Another constraint on health worker production is the acute shortage of intern posts for doctors, dentists, pharmacists and laboratory scientists as well as a shortage of residency posts for doctors and dentists. 89,90here is no school of public health in Nigeria, although most medical schools have small departments of community health, mainly for undergraduate training.A lack of public health schools focused on postgraduate professional education, leadership and research, results in serious limitations in the professional health workforce.In addition, the lack of bachelors and masters-level public health education, and service management training, results in weak capacity to promote public health programmes and to lead health services and systems.
In sum, the problems of the health workforce in Nigeria include: low salaries, health worker shortages particularly in rural and remote areas, skill-mix imbalances coupled with a curative orientation, maldistribution of specialists, a negative working environment, a weak evidence base, the challenge of HIV/AIDS, out-migration, and inadequate investment in the health sector.

THE WAY FORWARD
How should the New Public Health address the healthcare needs of populations worldwide?As stated by the WHO Director-General, "Ultimate responsibility for the performance of a country's health system lies with government." 91Government remains the leverage point for health workforce development as well.Its role is to: set policy, secure fi nancing for health services, support education, and operate the public health sector while regulating the private sector.The government needs to have national workforce strategic plans to guide enhanced investments in human resources, and to address the mix of professionals at every level.
New pressures on the health workforce in developing countries have emerged during the last two decades.The workforce has had to address a growing burden of chronic disease, spanning HIV/AIDS and noncommunicable illness, which requires a continuum of care, in particular community-based care.Technological advances (including diagnostics well-suited to home and community use) are now available and this makes care options that include properly integrated community workers more attractive.
It takes decades to build a qualifi ed health workforce.Multidisciplinary health teams -including clinicians, nurses, MLWs and community health workers -together with public health leaders and workers with a populationbased approach to healthcare, are required.It is essential however, to review teaching methods and materials to ensure that they are current and relevant.Urgent attention to training approaches for mid-level and community health workers is needed.Innovative approaches to teaching in industrialised and developing countries must be considered, with state-of-the-art teaching materials and continuing education through the creative use of information and communications technology.
All countries can accelerate health gains by investing in and managing their health workforce more strategically.Diverse national circumstances mean that solutions must be crafted to unique country challenges.Successful strategies should be country-based and country-led, focusing on the frontline in communities, and backed by appropriate international reinforcement.
While addressing migration is important, as illustrated by the 59 th World Health Assembly 92 call to countries to address migration of health personnel from developing countries, retention is only possible if locations of placements within developing countries (for example, in remote and rural areas) are made appealing to the workforce.
Health systems interventions, in particular the management of health workers, have to move away from business-as-usual.The potential 'agency' of individuals at multiple levels in the health system must be recognised and promoted.This cannot be achieved in systems when top-down, "onesize-fi ts-all" programs are introduced one after another.For public health systems in Africa to improve, the health workforce needs to work in an environment that supports and values them.Interventions that attempt to address this, such as professionalisation and creating organisational spaces to promote self-evaluation and shared learning, have been put forward.A need for posts for mentors -skilled people able to engage with health workers at the site of service delivery -is also suggested.This demands that health workforce plans go beyond a focus on additional numbers and cadres.A cultural shift is required which promotes 'agency' -the willingness of individuals in the health system to act on pressing issuesand the organisational space to take such action. 93ducation for managing the health workforce for better performance should bring together the health and educational sectors in strategic partnership to achieve three core objectives: coverage, motivation and competence.Coverage strategies promote numeric adequacy, appropriate skill mixes and outreach to vulnerable populations.Motivation strategies focus on adequate remuneration, a positive work environment, opportunities for career development and supportive health systems.Competencies are advanced through educating for appropriate attitudes and skills, creating conditions for continuous learning, and cultivating leadership, entrepreneurship and innovation.All these efforts should be oriented toward building national capacity. 9orkforce development is not merely a technical process -it is also political.It demands a strong action-coalition across all stakeholders with diverse interests.Health workers must be at the centre, but collaboration must reach beyond the health sector to fi nance, education and other ministries, and beyond government to academic leaders, professional associations, labour unions, educational institutions and non-governmental organisations.All should be involved in setting national goals, designing strategies, drawing up plans, and implementing policies and programs.
Good data and effective operational research and program evaluations, invariably scarce, are needed most.They are essential to inform policy makers and senior managers and to guide much needed efforts to develop an effective health workforce that can assure the health of populations.
These challenges, while daunting, should be addressed with the highest priority.The lofty goal of better public health is a global challenge but one that is addressable with 'healthy' healthcare systems.These must include adequate numbers and an adequate mix of clinical professionals, MLWs and community health workers.Fundamental to achieving this kind of broad system-wide approach in developing countries is a change in practice and attitude of international funding agencies, both public (bi-and multilaterals) and private.There is a consensus on the need to build better health systems.Further short-term, single-disease focused and technology-only interventions will not make possible the kind of changes required.More of the same will result in the same health systems challenges that we see today.A longer term view is required, with the aim of achieving slow, incremental change -it is the long-term sustainable "bang for the buck" that should be valued over the short term but bigger "bang".Cost-effectiveness assessments need to include a measure that refl ects long-term sustainability.
The solution to health workforce issues in low resource settings is complex and various approaches in combination are needed.Some require structural and managerial changes in health systems and human resource practice.Others concern improvement in salaries and living and working conditions for healthcare providers.In this article we looked specifi cally at two categories of healthcare worker -community-based health workers and mid-level workers -and assessed their potential to contribute to solutions.