Skip to main content
Download PDF

Public Health and the Aging Family

Public Health Reviews volume 32, pages 512–531 (2010)Cite this article

Abstract

The role of the family in the health of its members is critical from birth to death. This review focuses on the aging family, recognizing that the family is one of the earliest and longest lasting contexts influencing health. In particular, we emphasize the changing demographics of the family including the increased numbers of older family members and the decreased number of children. We consider how best to adapt to the changing family so that its critical role in maintaining individual and public health can be retained and enhanced. We begin by highlighting the importance of taking both a life span and life course perspective, recognizing that individuals develop and change over their lifetime. At the same time, they are members of groups and organizations, which shape their life course. We next consider the dramatically changing demographics of the population generally and within families specifically. We reflect on how these changes impact public health both positively and negatively, taking into account the potential of the family as a resource and a risk factor. We next consider five life course epidemiological models of health: the immediate effects model, the social trajectory model, the cumulative biological model, the sensitive period or latency model and the physiological effects of trajectory model. We explicitly consider the relevance of these models for the family and its aging members. Finally, we highlight what we consider the most important implications of these issues for the health and well-being of older adults and families in an aging society.

References

  1. 1.

    Crimmins EM. Trends in the health of the elderly. Ann Rev Public Health. 2004;25:79–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hamburg DA, Elliott GR, Parron DL. Institute of medicine. Health and behavior: Frontiers of research in the biobehavioral sciences. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Fuller-Iglesias H, Smith J, Antonucci TC. Theoretical perspectives on life span and life course development. In: Antonucci TC, ? Jackson JS, (editors). Ann Rev Gerontol Geriatr. 2010;29:3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Baltes P, Lindenberger U, Staudinger U. Life-span theory in developmental psychology. In: Lerner RM, (editor). Handbook of child psychology, 6th ed. New York (NY): Wiley; 2006. p. 569–664

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Elder GH Jr, Shanahan MJ. The life course and human development. In: Lerner RM, (editor). Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 1. New York (NY): Wiley; 2006. p. 665–781.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Settersten RA. The new landscape of adult life: Roadmaps, signposts, and speedlines. Res Human Develop. 2007;4:239–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Jacobsen LA, Mather M. Social and economic trends since 2000. Population Bull. 2010;65, 2–16.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bedford VH, Bleiszner R. Personal relationships in later-life families. In: Duck S, (editor). Handbook of personal relationships, 2nd ed. Chichester (UK): John Wiley; 1997. p. 523–530.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Crawford JM. Co-parent adoption by same-sex couples: From loophole to law. Families Soc. 1999;80:271–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Rothausen TJ. ‘Family’ in organizational research: A review and comparison of definitions and measures. J Organizational Behav. 1999;20:817–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Eurostat. Population Statistics. Luxembourg: European Communities. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    U.S. Bureau of the Census. America’s families and living arrangements. 2003. Available from URL. http://www.census.gov/prod/www/abs/p20.html (Accessed 30 September 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Casper LM, Cohen PN. How does POSSLQ measure up? National estimates of cohabitation. Demography. 2000;37:237–245.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The effects of marriage on health: A synthesis of recent research evidence. 2000. Available from URL: http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/07/marriageonhealth/rb.htm (Accessed 30 September 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Geggie J, Weston R, Hayes A, Siberberg S. The shaping of strengths and challenges of Australian families. Marriage Family Rev. 2007;41:217–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Sassler S, Cunningham A, Lichter DT. Intergenerational patterns of union formation and relationship quality. J Family Issues. 2009;30:757–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bumpass L, Lu H. Trends in cohabitation and implications for children’s family contexts in the U.S. Popul Stud. 2000;54:29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ganong L, Coleman M. Obligations to stepparents acquired in later life: Relationship quality and acquity of needs. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2006;61:580–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Sweeney M. Remarriage and stepfamilies: Strategic sites for family scholarship in the 21st century. J Marriage Family. 2010;72:667–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Sherman CW, Bass P. Spousal dementia caregiving in the context of later life remarriage. Dementia. 2007;6:245–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Sherman CW, Bauer JW. Financial conflicts facing late life remarriage. Alzheimer’s Disease. Family Relations. 2008;57:492–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Casper LM, Bianchi SM. Continuity and change in the American family. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Teachman JD, Tedrow LM, Crowder KD. The changing demography of America’s families. J Marriage Family. 2000;62:1234–1246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Martin MT, Emery RE, Peris TS. Single-parent families: Risks, resilience, and change. In: Coleman M, Ganong LH, (editors). Handbook of contemporary families: Considering the past, contemplating the future. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2004. p. 282–301.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Matthews TJ, Hamilton BE. Delayed childbearing: more women are having their first child later in life. NCHS Data Brief. 2009;21:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Hughes ME, Waite LJ, LaPierre TA, Luo Y. All in the family: The impact of caring for grandchildren on grandparents’ health. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007;62,S108–S119.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Antonucci TC, Birditt KS, Webster NJ. Social relations and mortality: A more nuanced approach. J Health Psyhcol. 2010;15:649–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Birditt KS, Jackey LMH, Antonucci TC. Longitudinal patterns of negative relationship quality across adulthood. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009;64B:55–64.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Brubaker TH. Families in later life: A burgeoning research area. J Marriage Family. 1990;52:959–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Fingerman KL, Pitzer LM, Chan W, Birditt KS, Franks MM, Zarit S. Who gets what and why: Help middle-aged adults provide to parents and grown children. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. In press.

  31. 31.

    Repetti RL, Taylor SE, Seeman TE. Risky families: Family social environments and the mental and physical health of offspring. Psychol Bull. 2002;128:330–366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Bachman, JG, O’Malley PM, Schulenberg JE, Johnston LD, Bryant AL, Merline AC. The decline of substance use in young adulthood: Changes in social activities, roles, and beliefs. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Birditt KS, Fingerman KL, Zarit S. Adult children’s problems and successes: Implications for intergenerational ambivalence. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010;65B:145–153.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ross CE, Mirowsky J, Goldsteen K. The impact of the family on health: The decade in review. J Marriage the Family. 1990;52:1059–1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wood RG, Goesling B, Avellar S. The effects of marriage on health. 2007. Available from URL: http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/07/marriageonhealth/rb.htm (Accessed 29 September 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Roberts BW, Smith J, Jackson JJ, Edmonds G. Compensatory conscientiousness in older couples. Psychol Science. 2009;20:553–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Windsor TD, Ryan LH, Smith J. Individual well being in older adulthood: Do spousal beliefs matter? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009;64:586–596.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    White L. Sibling relationships over the life course: A panel analysis. J Marriage Family. 2001;63:555–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Hetherington EM. Siblings, family relationships, and child development: Introduction. J Family Psychol. 1994;8:251–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Cicirelli VG. Sibling relationships in middle and old age. Adv App Develop Psychol. 1996;10:47–73.

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Gold DT. Sibling relationships in old age: A typology. Int J Aging Human Dev. 1986;28:37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Loucks EB, Berkman LF, Gruenewald TL, Seeman TE. Relations of social integration to inflammatory marker concentrations in men and women 70 to 79 years. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:1010–1016.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Antonucci TC, Birditt KS, Akiyama H. Convoys of social relations: an interdisciplinary approach. In: Bengston V, Silverstein M, Putney N, Gans N, (editors). Handbook of theories of aging. New York (NY): Springer Publishing Company. 2009. p.247–260.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Uchino BN. Social support and physical health: Understanding the health consequences of relationships. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press; 2004.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Birditt KS, Antonucci TC. Life sustaining irritations? Relationship quality and mortality in the context of severe illness. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:1291–1299.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Antonucci TC, Akiyama H. Convoys of social relations: Family and friendships within a life span context. In: Blieszner R, Bedford VH, (editors). Handbook of aging and the family. Westport (CT): Greenwood Press; 1995. p. 355–372.

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Antonucci TC, Jackson JS. Social support, interpersonal efficacy, and health. In: Carstensen LL, Edelstein BA, (editors). Handbook of clinical gerontology. New York (NY): Pergamon Press; 1987. p. 291–311.

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    McAvey GJ, Seeman TE. Rodin J. A longitudinal study of change in domain specific self-efficacy among older adults. J Gerontol. 1996;51b:243–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Luszczynska A, Gutierrez-Dona B, Schwarzer R. General self-efficacy in various domains of human functioning: Evidence from five countries. Int J Psychol. 2005;40:80–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Fiori K, McIlvane J, Brown E, Antonucci T. Social relations and depressive symptomatology: Self-efficacy as a mediator. Aging Mental Health. 2006;10:227–239.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Smith J, Goodnow JJ. Unasked-for support and unsolicited advice: Age and the quality of social experience. Psychol Aging. 1999;14:108–121.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kahn RL, Antonucci TC. Convoys over the life course: Attachment, roles and social support. In: Baltes BP, Brim OG, (editors). Life-span development and behavior, Vol. 3. New York (NY): Academic Press; 1980. p.253–286.

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Antonucci TC. Social relations: An examination of social networks, social support and sense of control. In: Birren JE, Schaie KW, (editors). Handbook of the psychology of aging, 5th ed. New York (NY): Academic Press; 2001. p. 427–453.

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Plath D. Long engagements: Maturity in modern Japan. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Glymour MM, Ertel KA, Berkman LF. What can life course epidemiology tell us about health inequalities in old age. In: Antonucci TC, Jackson JS, (editors). Ann Rev Gerontol Geriatr. 2010;29:27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Gallant MP. The influence of social support on chronic illness self-management: A review and directions or research. Health Educ Behav. 2003;30:170–195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Nicklett EJ, Liang J. Diabetes-related support, regimen adherence, and health decline among older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010;65B:390–399.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Pinquart M. Loneliness in married, widowed, divorced, and never-married older adults. J Soc Personal Relationship. 2003;20:31–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Ellis DA, Zucker RA, Fitzgerald, HE. The role of family influences in development and risk. Alcohol Health Res World. 1997;21:218–226.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q. 1988;15:351–378.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Lau RR, Quadrel MJ, Hartman KA. Development and change of young adults’ preventive health beliefs and behavior: Influence from parents and peers. J Health Soc Behav.1990;31:240–259.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Martorell R. Undernutrition during pregnancy and early childhood: Consequences for cognitive and behavioral development. In: Young ME, (editor). Early child development: Investing in our children’s future. Amsterdam and New York (NY): Elsevier Science BV; 1997. p. 39–83.

    Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Najman JM, Clavarino A, McGee TR, Bor W, Williams GM, Hayatbakhsh MR. Timing and chronicity of family poverty and development of unhealthy behaviors in children: A longitudinal study. J Adolesc Health. 2010;46:538–544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Bergman CS, Plomin R, Pedersen NL, McClearn GE. Genetic mediators of the relationship between social support and psychological well-being..Psychol Aging. 1991;64:640–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Shanahan MJ, Boardman JD. Gene-environment interplay across the life course: Overview and problematics at a new frontier. In: Elder GH Jr, Giele JZ (editors). The craft of life course research. New York (NY): Guilford Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Kouzis AC, Eaton WW. Absence of social networks, social support and health services utilization. Psychol Med. 1998;28:1301–1310.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Avlund K, Lund R, Holstein BE, Due P. Social relations as determinant of onset of disability in aging. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2004;38:85–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Arozullah AM, Lee S-YD, Khan T, Kurup, S, Ryan J, Bonner M, etal. The roles of low literacy and social support in predicting the preventability of hospital admission. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:140–145.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Jackson JS, Antonucci TC, Brown EE, Daatland SO, Sellers B. Race and ethnic influences on normative beliefs and attitudes: Toward provision of family care. In: Booth A, Coulter AC, Bianchi S, Seltzer JA, (editors). Intergenerational caregiving. Washington (DC): Urban Institute Press; 2008. p. 317–331.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. University of Michigan, USA

    Toni C. Antonucci & Kristin M. Wong

Authors
  1. Toni C. Antonucci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kristin M. Wong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toni C. Antonucci.

Additional information

Recommended Citation: Antonucci TC, Wong KM. Public Health and the Aging Family. Public Health Reviews. 2010;32:512–31.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Antonucci, T.C., Wong, K.M. Public Health and the Aging Family. Public Health Rev 32, 512–531 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391614

Download citation

Key Words

  • Aging
  • family
  • lifespan
  • lifecourse
  • social relations
  • epidemiological models

Public Health Reviews

ISSN: 2107-6952

Contact us