Skip to main content

Governance and Capacity Building in German and Austrian Public Health Since the 1950s


The German speaking countries (Germany and Austria) have a strong tradition of universal health insurance since the late 19th century. Germany was one of the leading countries in “social hygiene as health science”, an interdisciplinary field of academic work, health policy and practice, providing a comprehensive scientific basis both for professional education and training in the new academies for social hygiene, the schools of public health in the 1920s, and also for a rapidly growing network of municipal public health services. Public health in Austria at that time was less advanced. There was a rupture in the field of public health in these countries as the Nazi regime and World War II destroyed almost all of the human resources, the scientific basis and the institutional infrastructure required for advancement.

In the postwar period Germany was divided with separate social and health systems in East and West Germany until reunification in 1990. Meanwhile, Austria became a democratic federal republic developing a social welfare policy on the basis of a successful economy. Whereas Germany set up national programmes to support the development of a new public health, Austria established a health promotion fund. As a result, there has been more growth in the public health community in Germany than in Austria. However, in both countries strong efforts to strengthen the educational base will be needed to address the complex issues facing public health in the 21st century. For example, health expenditures in Germany and Austria are among the highest in the European Union, but health systems indicators such as healthy life years show values below the European average. The challenge to renew the highly fragmented systems of health/disease care and improve the social determinants of population health underline the need for strengthening public health structures and national policy in the two German speaking countries. Development of the scientific community is underway but has not yet reached the levels of the outstanding achievements of the late 19th and early 20th centuries.


  1. Heinzelmann W. Sozialhygiene als Gesundheitswissenschaft. Die deutsch/jüdische Avantgarde 1897–1933. Eine Geschichte in sieben Profilen. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. OECD. Health at a glance: Europe 2010. Available from URL:

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beaglehole R, Bonita R, Horton, Adams O, McKee M. Public health in the new era: improving health through collective action. Lancet 2004; 363: 2084–86 (Accessed 24 June, 2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Antonovsky A. Unraveling the mystery of health–how people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  5. American Public Health Association (APHA). Essential Public Health Services. Available from URL: (Accessed 25 June, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hawe P, Noort M, King L, Jordens C. Multiplying health gains: the critical role of capacity-building within health promotion programs. Health Policy 1997; 39: 29–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Saltman RB. Social health insurance in perspective: the challenge of sustaining stability. In: Saltmann RB, Busse R, Figueras J (eds.). Social health insurance systems in western Europe. New York: Open University Press, McGraw-Hill; 2004: 3–20. Available from URL: (Accessed 14 September, 20

    Google Scholar 

  8. OECD Health Data 2011. Health expenditure and financing 2010. Available from URL: (Accessed 14 September, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Busse R, Riesberg A. Health care systems in transition: Germany. WHO Regional Office for Europe on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Copenhagen; 2004 (Accessed 27 June, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hofmarcher MM, Rack H-M. Austria: health system review. Health systems in transition. 2006; 8(3):1–247. Available from URL: /__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/96435/E89021.pdf (Accessed 27 June, 2011).

  11. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Change of health expenditures in OECD countries. Available from URL:,3746,en_21571361_44315115_48289894_1_1_1_1,00.html (Accessed 14 September, 2011).

  12. Beck U. Weltrisikogesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Beck U, Giddens A, Lash S. Reflexive modernisation: politics, traditions and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rosenbrock R, Gerlinger T. Gesundheitspolitik. Eine systematische Einführung, 2. Auflage. Bern: Huber; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hauptverband der österreichischen Sozialversicherungsträger, The London School of Economics and Political Science, April 2010. Available from URL:

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bleich SN, Özaltin E, Murray CJL: How does satisfaction with the health-care system relate to patient experience? Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2009;87:271–278. Available from URL:–050401-table-T1.html (Accessed 9 April, 2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. McCarthy, Clark A (Guest eds). Public health research literatures in Europe. European Journal of Public Health. 2007;17(Suppl 1): 1–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dierks M-L. Postgraduierte Public-Health-Ausbildung und Berufsfelder im Bereich von Public Health. In: Schwartz FW, Badura B, Leidl R, Raspe H, Siegrist J, Walter U (Eds.). Public Health. Gesundheit und Gesundheitswesen. München Jena: Urban & Fischer: 772–779.

  19. Kälble K. Gesundheitsberufe unter Modernisierungsdruck. In: Pundt J (Ed.). Professionalisierung im Gesundheitswesen. Positionen–Potenziale–Persepektiven. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber; 2006. Pp. 213–233.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Austrian Public Health Association. Österreichische Gesellschaft für Public Health (ÖGPH). Available from URL: (Accessed 5 July, 2011).

  21. Tulchinsky TH, Varavikova EA. The New Public Health. Public Health Reviews. 2010; 32: 25–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Horst Noack, PhD.

Additional information

Recommended Citation: Noack H. Governance and Capacity Building in German and Austrian Public Health Since the 1950s. Public Health Reviews. 2011;33:264–76.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit

The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Noack, H. Governance and Capacity Building in German and Austrian Public Health Since the 1950s. Public Health Rev 33, 264–276 (2011).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

Key Words