Skip to main content

A Game Change in Global Health: The Best Is Yet to Come

Abstract

Health will continue to gather strength as a global public domain if it links itself strategically with other transnational agendas and strengthens its political ability to produce global public goods for health. Three new political spaces offer opportunities to take the global health agenda a significant step forward: the emerging new development paradigm, the post-2015 debates at the United Nations and the dynamics created through the increasing trans-border health challenges the World Health Organization (WHO) must deal with under conditions of globalization. Presently there are concerns whether the major initiatives that have boosted global health in the last 20 years will continue to grow and attract sufficient funding. But the more pertinent question is whether they are still suited to address the major concerns global health faces between now and 2030. In addition many of the global health challenges can only be addressed through actions in sectors other than health and by facing the inherently political nature of health as well as strong opposition from parts of the private sector. A well-financed and rules based governance system — adapted to complex multilateralism — is needed to manage, complement and integrate the many issue-based initiatives. The next era of global health will be judged by its political capacity to ensure global health security, build universal health coverage, address the commercial determinants of non-communicable diseases and reduce global health inequalities. This will require a focus on producing global public goods for health (GPGH) through strong international organizations, in particular the WHO, supported by governments who have the political will and the institutional capacity to practice smart sovereignty, reach beyond the heath sector and engage with non-state actors.

References

  1. 1.

    Sumner A, Mallett R. The Future of Foreign Aid: Development Cooperation and the New Geography of Global Poverty. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Drager N, Abbott F. The ‘PIP’ (Pandemic Influenza Preparedness) Framework: Smart sovereignty to improve the sharing of influenza viruses with pandemic potential, while also moving towards more predictable and equitable access to vaccines in future pandemics vaccines in future pandemics. Annex 2. In: Kaul I (editor). Global public goods: a concept for framing the post-2015 agenda? Discussion paper. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik; February 2013. pp.43–45. Available from URL: http://www.die-gdi.de/CMS-Homepage/openwebcms3.nsf/%28ynDK_contentByKey%29/ANES-959D4N/$FILE/DP%202.2013.pdf (Accessed 13 April 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ruggie JG. Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights. First edition. New York and London: W. W. Norton & Company; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe. Health in foreign policy and development cooperation: public health is global health. Regional Committee for Europe, Sixtieth Session, Moscow, 13–16 September 2010. WHO/Europe; 2010. Available from URL: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/119542/RC60_edoc14.pdf (Accessed 13 April 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kickbusch I. Global Health Governance: some new theoretical considerations on the new political space. In: Lee K (editor) Globalization and Health. London: Palgrave; 2003. pp.192–203.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    World Health Organization. Sixty-sixth World Health Assembly: daily notes on proceedings. WHO; 27 May 2013. Available from URL: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/events/2013/wha66/journal/en/index.html (Accessed 7 June 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ruggie JG. Reconstituting the Global Public Domain: Issues, Actors, and Practices. Eur J Int Relations. 2004;10:499–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Fidler DP. After the revolution: global health politics in a time of economic crisis and threatening future trends. Global Health Governance. 2008;2:1–21. Available from URL: http://www.ghgj.org (Accessed 12 April 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Morrison JS. The end of the golden era of global health? Center for Strategic and International Studies; 17 April 2012. Available from URL: http://csis.org/publication/end-golden-era-global-health (Accessed 10 April 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Garrett L. Blog series on global health. 2013. http://lauriegarrett.com/blog/ (Accessed 7 June 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Andriote J-M. An optimistic era for global infectious disease control. The Atlantic; 13 February 2013. Available from URL: http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/02/an-optimistic-era-for-global-infectious-disease-control/273041/ (Accessed 11 April 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Greenhill R, Prizzon A, Rogerson A. The age of choice: developing countries in the new aid landscape. A synthesis report. ODI Working Papers 364; January 2013. Available from URL: http://www.odi.org.uk/publications/7163-age-choice-developing-countries-new-aid-landscape (Accessed 11 April 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    UNAIDS. Together we will end AIDS. Geneva, Switzerland: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS); 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Regional Network for Equity in Health in East and Southern Africa (EQUINET). Expansion of the private for-profit health sector in East and Southern Africa. Policy Series No. 26; November 2011. Available from URL: http://www.equinetafrica.org/bibl/docs/Pol26%20brief%20privatefin.pdf (Accessed 7 June 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Carothers T, de Gramont D. Development Aid Confronts Politics: The Almost Revolution. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment For International Peace; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ogden T. Living with the Gates Foundation: a retrospective: A summary of articles and discussions about the Gates Foundation’s impact on global social change. Stanford Social Innovation Blog; 20 December 2011. Available from URL: http://www.ssireview.org/blog/entry/living_with_the_gates_foundationa_retrospective (Accessed 7 June 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kazatchkine M. How AIDS changed global health forever. Comment in: The Sydney Morning Herald; 22 May 2013. Available from URL: http://www.smh.com.au/comment/how-aids-changed-global-health-forever-20130521-2jyu7.html (Accessed 7 June 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kickbusch I. The need for a European strategy on global health. Scand J Public Health. 2006;34:561–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    People’s Health Movement. The People’s Charter for Health. People’s Health Movement; 10 April 2013. Available from URL: http://www.phmovement.org/en/resources/charters/peopleshealth (Accessed 7 June 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Karanikolos M, Mladovsky P, Cylus J, Thomson S, Basu S, et al. Financial crisis, austerity, and health in Europe. Lancet. 2013;381:1323–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Moodie R, Stuckler D, Monteiro C, Sheron N, Neal B, et al. Profits and pandemics: prevention of harmful effects of tobacco, alcohol, and ultra-processed food and drink industries. Lancet. 2013;381:670–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Held D. Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sassen S. A Sociology of Globalization. 1st edition. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ferroni M, Moody A (editors). International Public Goods: Incentives, Measurement and Financing. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    The Lancet. Australia’s plain tobacco packaging. Lancet. 2012;380:704.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    World Economic Forum. Global Risks 2013: Eighth Edition. An initiative of the risk response network. World Economic Forum; 2013. Available from URL: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalRisks_Report_2013.pdf (Accessed 13 April 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kaul I. Global public goods: a concept for framing the post-2015 agenda? Discussion Paper. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik; February 2013. Available from URL: http://www.die-gdi.de/CMS-Homepage/openwebcms3.nsf/%28ynDK_contentByKey%29/ANES-959D4N/$FILE/DP%202.2013.pdf (Accessed 13 April 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    English.news.cn. China gains international recognition for immediate, effective responses to H7N9. 22 May 2013. Available from URL: http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/health/2013-05/22/c_132399851_2.htm (Accessed 7 June 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    University of Maryland. How and why to price carbon: a price commitment is neither a cap nor a tax. Available from URL: http://www.cramton.umd.edu/climate/ (Accessed 7 June 2013).

  30. 30.

    Shafik N. The future of development finance. Working Paper 250. Center for Global Development; May 2011. Available from URL: http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/file_Shafik_Future_of_Finance_Dev_FINAL.pdf (Accessed 13 April 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Report 2013. The rise of the South: human progress in a diverse world. UNDP; 2013. Available from URL: http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr2013/ (Accessed 12 April 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Financing global health 2010: development assistance and country spending in economic uncertainty. IHME; 2010. Available from URL: http://www.healthmetricsandevaluation.org/publications/policy-report/financing_global_health_2010_IHME (Accessed 25 June 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    OECD. Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness. OECD; 2010. Available from URL: http://www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/fourthhighlevelforumonaideffectiveness.htm (Accessed 7 June 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    United Nations. High-Level Panel Report on the Post-2015 Development Agenda. 2013. Available from URL: http://www.post2015hlp.org/ (Accessed 7 June 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    United Nations. The future we want: Rio+20 Outcome Document. Available from URL: http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/rio20_outcome_document_complete.pdf (Accessed 7 June 2013).

  36. 36.

    Griggs D, Stafford-Smith M, Gaffney O, Rockström J, Ohman MC, et al. Policy: sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature. 2013;495:305–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kickbusch I, Brindley C. Post-2015 development agenda: food security and health. 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    United Nations. A new global partnership: eradicate poverty and transform economies through sustainable development. United Nations; 2013. The Report of the High-Level Panel of Eminent Persons on the Post-2015 Development Agenda. Available from URL: http://www.post2015hlp.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/UN-Report.pdf (Accessed 7 June 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    The NCD Alliance. Healthy planet, healthy people: The NCD Alliance vision for health in the post-2015 development agenda. The NCD Alliance; 2013. Available from URL: http://ncdalliance.org/sites/default/files/rfiles/NCD%20Alliance%20Policy%20Brief%20-%20Health%20in%20the%20Post-2015%20Development%20Agenda_%20%28US,%20web%29.pdf (Accessed 7 June 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Low-Beer D. Innovative Health Partnerships: The Diplomacy of Diversity. Global Health Diplomacy, Volume 1. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company; 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Altinay H. Global norms as global public goods. Global Policy Essay; April 2013. Available from URL: http://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/sites/default/files/pdf/Altinay%20-%20Global%20Norms%20as%20Global%20Public%20Goods%2004.13.pdf (Accessed 7 June 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Beck U. Power in the Global Age. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Bäckstrand K. Accountability of networked climate governance: the rise of transnational climate partnerships. Global Environmental Politics. 2008;8:74–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kickbusch I, Kökény M. Global health diplomacy: five years on. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91:159–159A. Available from URL: http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/91/3/13-118596/en/ (Accessed 17 April 2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Khanna P. How to Run the World: Charting a Course to the Next Renaissance. New York, NY: Random House; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Keohane RO. Global governance and democratic accountability. Duke University; 2002. Available from URL: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/apcity/unpan034133.pdf (Accessed 12 April 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Silberschmidt G, Matheson D, Kickbusch I. Creating a committee C of the World Health Assembly. Lancet. 2008;371:1483–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    High Level Taskforce on Innovative International Financing of Health Systems. More money for health, and more health for the money. 2010. Available from URL: http://www.internationalhealthpartnership.net/fileadmin/uploads/ihp/Documents/Results___Evidence/HAE__results___lessons/Taskforce_report_EN.2009.pdf (Accessed 7 June 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    World Health Organization. Factsheet on funding and research mechanisms. Background document provided by the WHO Secretariat; 14 November 2012. Available from URL: http://www.who.int/phi/2-funding_mechanism_factsheets_6nov12.pdf (Accessed 17 April 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Kahler M. Global Governance Redefined. Paper presented at the Conference on Globalization, the State, and Society, Washington University School of Law, St. Louis; 13–14 November 2003. Available from URL: http://law.wustl.edu/centeris/Papers/globalization/KAHLERMilesFINALPAPER.pdf (Accessed 17 April 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Kanth P, Gleicher D, Guo Y. National strategies for global health. Chapter 20. In: Kickbusch I, Lister G, Told M, Drager N (editors). Global Health Diplomacy: Concepts, Issues, Actors, Instruments, Fora And Cases. New York, NY: Springer; 2013. pp.285–304.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kickbusch I. Decentralization and WHO reform: a broader perspective. Global Health Programme Working Paper N°8; 2013. Available from URL: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/184631/DECENTRALIZATION-AND-WHO-REFORM,-A-BROADER-PERSPECTIVE.pdf (Accessed 17 April 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Sachs JD. Macroeconomics and health: investing in health for economic development. Report of the Commission on Macroeconomics and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilona Kickbusch PhD.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kickbusch, I. A Game Change in Global Health: The Best Is Yet to Come. Public Health Rev 35, 2 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391687

Download citation

Key Words

  • Global health
  • global public goods for health
  • new development paradigm
  • smart sovereignty