Skip to main content

Social Media Engagement and Public Health Communication: Implications for Public Health Organizations Being Truly “Social”

Abstract

Social media are designed to be engaging, but often are used as a mechanism by public health organizations and practitioners for mass information dissemination rather than engaging audiences in true multi-way conversations and interactions. In this article we define and discuss social media engagement for public health communication. We examine different levels of engagement for public health communication and consider the potential risks, benefits, and challenges of truly embracing the social component in public health practice. Some implications of engagement for public health communication via social media are addressed, and recommendations for future work and research are proposed.

References

  1. 1.

    Duggan M, Brennar J. Pew Research Center’s internet and American life project. The demographics of social media users — 2012. 14 February 2013. Available from URL: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Social-media-users.aspx (Accessed 18 April 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Facebook. Newsroom. Available from URL: https://newsroom.fb.com/Key- Facts (Accessed 17 July 2013).

  3. 3.

    Korda H, Itani, Z. Harnessing social media for health promotion and behavior change. Health Promot Pract. 2013;14:15–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Chou WS, Prestin A, Lyons C, Wen K. Web 2.0 health promotion: reviewing the current evidence. Am J Public Health. 2013;103:e9–18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Chou SW, Hunt YM, Beckjord, ELB, Moser RP, Hesse BW. Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11:e48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Lefebvre RC, Bornkessel, AS. Digital social networks and health. Circulation. 2013;127:1829–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Martin-Moreno JM, Apfel F, Sanchez, JLS, Galea, G, Zsuzsanna J. The social nature of chronic noncommunicable diseases and how to tackle them though communication technology, training, and outreach. J Health Commun. 2011; 16:94–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Teutsch SM, Fielding JE. Rediscovering the core of public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2013;34:287–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Neiger BL, Thackery R, Burton SH, Giraud-Carrier CG, Fagen, MC. Evaluating social media’s capacity to develop engaged audiences in health promotion settings: Use of Twitter metrics as a case study. Health Promot Pract. 2013;14:157–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Thackeray R, Beiger BL, Smith AK, Van Wagenen SB. Adoption and use of social media among public health departments. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12:242.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Waters RD, Williams JM. Squawking, tweeting, cooing, and hooting: analyzing the communication patterns of government agencies on Twitter. J Public Affairs. 2011;11:353–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Park H, Rodgers S, Stemmie J. Health organizations’ use of Facebook for health advertising and promotion. J Interactive Advertising. 2011;12:62–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Avery E, Lariscy R, Amador E, Ickowitz T, Primm C, Taylor A. Diffusion of social media among public relations practitioners in health departments across various community population sizes. J Public Relations Res. 2010;22: 336–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Health Communicator’s Social Media Toolkit. July 2011. Available from URL: http://www.cdc.gov/socialmedia/tools/guidelines/pdf/socialmediatooMt_bni.pdf (Accessed 6 May 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Abroms LC, Lefebvre RC. Obama’s wired campaign: Lessons for public health communication. J Health Comm. 2009;14:415–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Mangold WG, Faulds DJ. Social meida: the new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Bus Horiz. 2009;52:357–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Fox S, Duggan M. Pew Research Center’s internet and American life project. Health online 2013.15 January 2013. Available from URL: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Health-online.aspx (Accessed 28 March 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Weaver JB III, Mays D, Linder G, Eroglu D, Fridinger F, Bernhardt, JM. Profiling characteristics of internet medical information users. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16:714–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Nyswander D. Education for health: some principles and their application. Health Edu Monogr. 1956;14:65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Bernhardt JM. Health education and the digital divide: building bridges and filling chasms. Health Edu Res. 2000;15:527–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wang CC. The future of health promotion: TalkinTM technology blues. Health Promot Pract. 2000;1:77–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kemble SK, Westbrook A, Lynfield R, Board A, Koktavy N, et al. Foodborne outbreak of Group A Streptococcus Pharyngitis associated with a high school dance team banquet—Minnesota, 2012. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57:344–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Brownstein JS, Clark C, Freifeld BS, Madoff LC. Digital disease detection— harnessing the web for public health surveillance. N Engl J Med. 2009:360:2153–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    St. Louis C, Zorlu G Can Twitter predict disease outbreaks? BMJ. 2012;344:e2353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Clinical and Translational Science Awards Consortium, Community Engagement Key Function Committee Task Force on the Principles of Community Engagement. Principles of Community Engagement, Second Edition. 2011. Available from URL: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/communityengagement/pdf/ PCE_Report_508_FINAL.pdf (Accessed 18 April 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Minkler M, Wallerstein NB. Improving health through community organization and community building. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM, (editors). Health Behavior and Health Education. Theory, Research, and Practice. 3rd Edition. San Francisco: Josey-Bass; 2002. pp. 279–311.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Principles of community engagement. Second Edition. CDC/ATSDR Committee on Community Engagement. 1997, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Fox Z. World water day campaigns making a splash on the web. 22 March 2013. Available from URL: http://mashable.com/2013/03/22/world-water-day-social-media/ (Accessed 18 April 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Papworth L. I levels of social media engagement. 11 March 2011. Available from URL: www.socialmediatoday.com (Accessed 5 March 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Tuvell Communications. The 5 levels of social media engagement. 16 August 2011. Available from URL: http://www.slideshare.net/tuvelcomms/the-5-levels-of-social-media-engagement (Accessed 28 April 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Paul S. The 5 stages of social media engagement. 13 February 2012. Available from URL: http://whatworkswhere.com/index.php/2012/global/the-5-stages-of-social-media-engagement-part-l-of-5-traditional/ (Accessed 28 April 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Dyer P. 50 top tools for social media monitoring, analytics, and management. 13 May 2013. Available from URL: http://socialmediatoday.com/node/145746 (Accessed 17 July 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    CIO Council. Privacy Best Practices for Social Media. July 2013. Available from URL: https://cio.gov/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2013/07/Privacy-Best-Practices-for-Social-Media.pdf (Accessed 24 October 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Booth N, Matic JA. Mapping and leveraging influencers in social media to shape corporate brand perceptions. Corporate Communications. 2011;16:184–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Biran O, Rosental S, Andrea J, McKeown K, Rambow O. Detecting influencers in written online conversations. Proceedings of the 2012 Workshop on Language in Social Media (LSM 2012). pp. 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Daniel, V. Secrets to successful influencer engagement for dynamic Twitter chats. National Conference on Health Communication, Marketing, and Media. 20–22 August 2013. Oral presentation, abstract 33733.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Jones R. Using CDC Twitter chats to engage key influencers and extend reach. National Conference on Health Communication, Marketing, and Media. 7–9 August 2012. Oral presentation, abstract 31843.

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Web, J. Five characteristics of an influencer. 19 October 2011. Available from URL: http://www.meeklabs.com/social-marketing/social-media/five-character istics-of-an-influencer/ (Accessed 8 May 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Freberg K, Graham K, McGaughey K, Freberg L A Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality. Public Relat Rev. 2011;37:90–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    U.S. General Services Administration. Challenge.gov. Available from URL: http://challenge.gov/ (Accessed 31 March 2013).

  41. 41.

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. AIDS.gov. Facing AIDS. Available from URL: http://facing.aids.gov/ (Accessed 18 April 2013).

  42. 42.

    National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Connect and collaborate with NASA. Available from URL: http://www.nasa.gov/connect/social/index.html (Accessed 16 March 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    American Red Cross. Red Cross University: digital disaster volunteer training. Available from URL: http://redcrosschat.org/disaster-digital-volunteer-training/ (Accessed 16 March 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 20 March 2011. Available from URL: http://www.samhsa.gov/about/feedback.aspx (Accessed 15 March 2013).

  45. 45.

    Mays D, Weaver JB III, Bernhardt JM. New media in social marketing. In: Hastings G, Angus K, Bryant C, (editors). The Sage Handbook of Social Marketing. London: Sage; 2011. pp. 178–90.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  46. 45.

    Cameron AM, Massie AB, Alexander CE, Stewart B, Montgomery RA, Benavides NR, Fleming GD, Segev, DL. Social media and organ donation registration: the Facebook effect. Am J Transplant. 2013;13;2059–65.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 46.

    Fox S. The social life of health information 2011. 12 May 2011. Available from URL: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Social-Life-of-Health-Info.aspx (Accessed 20 March 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  48. 47.

    Moorhead SA, Hazlett DE, Harrison L, Carroll JK, Irwin A, Hoving C. A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15:385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 48.

    Ratzan SC. Our new “social” communication age in health. J Health Comm. 2011;16:803–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 49.

    Cheung CMK, Thadani DR. The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: a literature analysis and integrative model. Decision Support Systems. 2012;54:461–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 50.

    Anderson A, Brossard D, Scheufele DA, Xenos MA, Lawig P. The “nasty effect:” online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. J Comput Médiat Commun. 2013; epub ahead of print.

    Google Scholar 

  52. 51.

    U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC social media tools, guidelines, & best practices. 17 April 2013. Available from URL: www.cdc.gov/socialmedia/Tools/guidelines (Accessed 16 July 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  53. 52.

    U.S. General Services Administration. Digital strategy. Available from URL: http://www.howto.gov/digital-strategy (Accessed 16 July 2013).

  54. 53.

    Jürgens P. Communities of communication: making sense of the “social” in social media. J Technol Hum Serv. 2012;30:186–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 54.

    Regenberg AC. Tweeting science and ethics: social media as a tool for constructive public engagement. Am J Bioeth. 2010;10:30–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 55.

    U.S. General Services Administration. Social media metrics for Federal agencies. 19 April 2013. Available from URL: http://www.howto.gov/social-media/using-social-media-in-government/metrics-for-federal-agencies (Accessed 19 April 2013).

  57. 56.

    #SMMStandards. 2012. About #SMMStandards. Available from URL: www. smmstandards.com (Accessed 24 July 2013).

  58. 57.

    Ledford CJ. Changing channels: a theory-based guide to selecting traditional, new, and social media in strategic social marketing. SocMarQ. 2012; 18:175–86.

    Google Scholar 

  59. 58.

    U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Crisis and emergency risk communication. 2008. Available from URL: http://emergency.cdc.gov/cerc/ pdf/cerc_guide_basic.pdf (Accessed 15 March 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  60. 59.

    Merchant RM, Elmer S, Lurie N. Integrating social media into emergency- preparedness efforts. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:289–91.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 60.

    Huffington Post. Cory Booker at SXSW: government needs to reform social media strategy. 10 March 2013. Available from URL: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/10/cory-booker-sxsw_n_2850442.html (Accessed 16 March 2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy Burnett Heldman MPH.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heldman, A.B., Schindelar, J. & Weaver, J.B. Social Media Engagement and Public Health Communication: Implications for Public Health Organizations Being Truly “Social”. Public Health Rev 35, 13 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391698

Download citation

Key Words

  • Social media
  • engagement
  • public health communication
  • public health